| |
Religious campaigners in India and Pakistan take offence at a film titled PK
|
|
|
 | 31st December 2014
|
|
| See
article from
timesofindia.indiatimes.com See
article from mid-day.com
See article from sikhsiyasat.net
|
PK is a 2014 India comedy romance by Rajkumar Hirani. Starring Aamir Khan, Anushka Sharma and Sanjay Dutt.
 A stranger in the city asks questions no one has asked
before. Known only by his initials, P.K.'s innocent questions and childlike curiosity will take him on a journey of love, laughter and letting-go.
Hindu campaigners have been attacking PK, a recently released Indian film. Bajrang Dal
and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad disrupted the screening of the film at several locations demanding that supposedly objectionable scenes insulting Hindu deities and rituals be censored from the film. In Ahmedabad, protests went violent as over
50 Bajrang Dal activists stormed and vandalised two theaters, Shiv and City Gold Multiplex. Though the miscreants fled before the police arrived, sources said the activists have been identified through CCTV footage. Religious campaigners burned
posters outside Milan cinema in Surendranagar, where the film was being screened, and forced a shutdown of the movie hall for the day. In Rajkot, saffron activists hit the streets against the film. In Bhopal, sangh parivar activists raised slogans
against Aamir Khan and jostled with cops outside Jyoti Talkies in Bhopal. Bajrang Dal and VHP have given a 24-hour ultimatum to the film's producers for removing anti-Hindu scenes. VHP-Bajrang Dal spokesman for central India Devendra Rawat said:
It has become a habit with Bollywood to hurt the sentiments of Hindus. They insult our gods and show our spiritual gurus as villains. Why don't they make a film based on Imam Bukhari and his anti-national statements?
In Delhi, police said they had stepped up security around several theatres after violent protests at Rivoli cinema in Connaught Place on Sunday when religious campaigners had smashed the theatre's window panes. All India Muslim
Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) member Maulana Khalid Rashid Firangi Mahali has demanded that the Censor Board remove objectionable scenes so that communal harmony is not disturbed. He said: If a film has material that
hurts religious sentiments, especially when it has a Muslim actor playing a Hindu, it has the propensity to be misread.
The PK issue has also revealed that chief censor Leela Samson seems to be edged out of her job. She explained:
The ministry has not taken up the issue with me or other officials of CBFC. However, they have often chosen to bypass me and speak to officials appointed by them indicating their 'concern' about a particular film, she
adds.
Samson minces no words while criticising the government, alleging that the former I&B minister Prakash Javadekar never kept his promise of allowing the board to appoint for its panels professionals who are well informed about
sensitive issues. Panel members who view the films have a heavy dose of party people amongst them. Meanwhile in Pakistan, a Hindu group named Hindu Kranti Dal had filed a complaint against PK before police commissioner of Jalandhar Yurinder
Singh Hayer. Police watched PK with leaders and activists of Hindu Kranti Dal and ordered removed of scenes against which the Hindu outfit raised objections. Hindu Kranti Dal leader Manoj Nanna said that makers of PK have disgraced Hindu god Shiv.
He said that HKD want police action against PK director Raj Kumar Hirani and actor Aamir Khan. |
| |
The movie, Exodus: Gods and Kings
|
|
|
 | 28th December 2014
|
|
| 27th December 2014. See article from
timesofisrael.com See also list of films banned internationally |
Exodus: Gods and Kings is a 2014 UK / USA / Spain drama by Ridley Scott. Starring Christian Bale, Joel Edgerton and Ben Kingsley.
 Epic adventure Exodus: Gods and Kings is the story of
one man's daring courage to take on the might of an empire. Using state of the art visual effects and 3D immersion, Scott brings new life to the story of the defiant leader Moses as he rises up against the Egyptian Pharaoh Ramses, setting 600,000 slaves
on a monumental journey of escape from Egypt and its terrifying cycle of deadly plagues.
Egypt has banned the Hollywood biblical epic movie Exodus: Gods and Kings for reasons of religious intolerance whilst citing 'historical
inaccuracy' The film relates how the religious character Moses helped Israelite slaves flee persecution in Egypt under the Pharaoh Ramses by parting the Red Sea to let them cross safely. Culture Minister Gaber Asfour told AFP Ridley Scott's
blockbuster was rife with mistakes, including an apparent claim that Moses and the Jews built the pyramids. Asfour claimed: This totally contradicts proven historical facts. It is a Zionist film. It gives a
Zionist view of history and contains historical inaccuracies and that's why we have decided to ban it.
Mohammed Afifi, the head of the censorship committee, said he took issue with the scene showing the parting of the Red Sea in which
Moses is seen holding a sword like a warrior, instead of a stick. Furthermore, he claimed, the parting of the Red Sea is explained in the movie as a tidal phenomenon rather than a divine miracle. Morocco has also banned the
film, despite it already having been approved by the state-run Moroccan Cinema Center. Hassan Belkady, who runs Cinema Rif in Casablanca, told media24 news website that he had been threatened with the closure of his business if he ignored the ban.
Update: UAE recommends Exodus 28th December 2014. See article from
hollywoodreporter.com
The United Arab Emirates became the latest country to ban the release of Exodus: Gods and Kings . A film censor from the National Media Council, Juma Obeid Al Leem, told Gulf News: This movie is under our review
and we found that there are many mistakes not only about Islam but other religions too. So, we will not release it in the UAE.
|
| |
Cinema takes down poster for the upcoming movie, Fifty Shades of Grey,
|
|
|
 | 27th December
2014
|
|
| From whtimes.co.uk |
A film advert for the forthcoming movie, Fifty Shades of Grey, was taken down from outside a cinema after the cinema received a few whinges. The poster depicted the head and shoulders of Dakota Johnson, playing Anastasia Steele, blindfolded, bare
shouldered and apparently in the throes of passion. The poster was on display outside the recently refurbished leisure complex. A spokesman for the Garden City Cinema said: We are very sorry if we caused
any offence to anyone. The film is set to be a huge blockbuster and is already selling well with us, even though it doesn't open until Valentine's Day 2015. The poster reflects the erotic nature of the film
and was not explicit, but we understand if some people have taken offence.
|
| |
Hacker group demands that Sony cancels the release of its new movie, The Interview
|
|
|
 | 27th December 2014
|
|
| 9th December 2014. See
article from
independent.co.uk |
Hackers claiming to be those that have seriously disrupted Sony Pictures' computer systems in the biggest corporate hack in history posted a message to the heads of the company telling them to cancel the release of film The Interview . The
group also leaked a trove of emails from senior Sony Pictures employees which include private employee information, the phone numbers of actors and the aliases they use when travelling, film budgets and unreleased scripts. It includes the private
information of about 40,000 employees, including home addresses, previous salaries and social security numbers. The Interview is a North Korea-baiting film that is a reason some have speculated that the country could be involved in the attack.
In a message titled Their Privacy , and written in broken English, hackers said that Sony had refused to give in to its demands to cancel the release of the movie of terrorism. The group signed themselves as From God'sApstls. The
message reads: We have already given our clear demand to the management team of SONY, however, they have refused to accept. It seems that you think everything will be well, if you find
out the attacker, while no reacting to our demand. We are sending you our warning again. Do carry out our demand if you want to escape us. And, Stop immediately
showing the movie of terrorism which can break the regional peace and cause the War! You, SONY & FBI, cannot find us. We are perfect as much. The destiny of SONY
is totally up to the wise reaction & measure of SONY.
Update: Violent threats prove to be very effective at censorship 17th December 2014. See
article from bbc.co.uk The New York premiere of The Interview, a comedy about
the assassination of North Korea's president, has been cancelled amid threats from hackers. A spokesman for the cinema chain due to host the screening said it had been shelved. Hackers targeting Sony Pictures had threatened to attack US cinemas showing
the studio's film. Calling themselves Guardians of Peace, the hackers mentioned the 9/11 attacks in a recent warning, claiming the world will be full of fear . Remember the 11th of September 2001. We recommend you to keep yourself
distant from the places at that time, the hacker group wrote in a message. A spokesman for Landmark, the cinema chain due to host the New York premiere, confirmed the showing had been cancelled but gave no reason, Reuters news agency reported.
Executives from Sony had previously said they would not object if cinemas chose not to show The Interview. Update: Hollywood runs out of baddies 18th December 2014. See article from telegraph.co.uk See also
The Interview hack scandal could spell end to foreign movie villains from telegraph.co.uk Sony has bowed to the demands of North Korean-linked hackers and made the unprecedented step of pulling its film The Interview from
cinemas. Sony announced the movie would not be released as planned in America on Christmas Day after threats of violence by the hackers. The decision was made after the five biggest cinema chains in the US, operating 20,000 screens between them,
said they would not show the comedy, which centres on a plot to assassinate the secretive state's leader Kim Jong-un. Sony said it had no further global release plans for the film - which had a scheduled UK release date of Feb 6, 2015. US
investigators said it had determined North Korea was behind the devastating cyber attack following weeks of speculation. President Barack Obama said his administration is taking the cyber attack against Sony studios seriously, but urged cinemagoers not
be cowed by the threats. Many were quick to criticise Sony's decision, calling it a major blow for freedom of expression and warned it could set a dangerous precedent of censorship.
Offsite Comment: US weighs response to film threat 19th December 2014. See article from
thehill.com The White House is treating the cyberattack on Sony Pictures as a legitimate national security matter as the film studio deals with the fallout
from its controversial decision to pull The Interview from theaters. ... Read the full article
Update: World Police cower from violent bully 19th December 2014. See article from
thehill.com
After Sony yanked North Korean satire The Interview from theaters, several small houses announced plans to show Team America - another film featuring a North Korean leader - in an attempt to spite the hermit regime. However,
Paramount Pictures has now put the kibosh on the screenings - sending out messages barring the cinemas from showing the movie. One of the theaters, the Alamo Drafthouse Cinema said; Due to to circumstances
beyond our control, the TEAM AMERICA 12/27 screening has been cancelled. We apologize & will provide refunds today.
Paramount however has yet to explain their decision to ban cinemas from showing the film. Team America: World
Police features the previous leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-il as a singing marionette that gets impaled on a spike and is later revealed to be a space alien North Korea called The Interview and act of war for portraying the assassination
and violent death of its current leader, Kim Jong-un. Offsite Update: Flimsy evidence 20th December 2014. See
The Evidence That North Korea Hacked Sony Is Flimsy from wired.com
Update: America is about kowtowing to North Korean threats 20th December 2014. See article
from theguardian.com
Sony made a mistake by axing the comedy The Interview . Speaking after the FBI pinned the blame on North Korea for a massive hack of Sony Pictures, President Barack Obama said: We cannot have a society in
which some dictator some place can start imposing censorship here in the United States because if somebody is able to intimidate folks out of releasing a satirical movie, imagine what they start doing when they see a documentary that they don't like, or
news reports that they don't like. Or even worse imagine if producers and distributors and others start engaging in self-censorship because they don't want to offend the sensibilities of somebody whose sensibilities probably need
to be offended. That's not who we are. That's not what America is about.
Obama said he was sympathetic to Sony's plight but added: I wish they had spoken to me first. Update: America makes a token gesture about free speech
24th December 2014. See article from telegraph.co.uk In a plot reversal, Sony Pictures will allow The Interview to play in about 200 US cinemas as of Christmas Day, after coming under criticism from President Barack Obama for
caving into pressure from North Korea The Interview was put back into cinemas on Tuesday when Sony Pictures Entertainment announced a limited Christmas Day theatrical release for the comedy that provoked an international incident with North Korea
and outrage over its cancelled release. Sony Entertainment CEO Michael Lynton that Seth Rogen's North Korea farce will be in a number of theaters beginning Thursday. Update: Monkey 27th December 2014.
From huffingtonpost.com
North Korea called President Barack Obama a monkey and blamed the US for shutting down its Internet amid the hacking row over the comedy The Interview. The country's powerful National Defense Commission, the country's top governing body led
by Kim Jong Un, said that Obama was behind the release of The Interview . It described the movie as illegal, dishonest and reactionary. A spokesman said: Obama always goes reckless in words and deeds like a
monkey in a tropical forest.
|
| |
|
|
|
 | 27th
December 2014
|
|
|
Is Sony's crackdown a bigger threat to western free speech than North Korea? See article from
theguardian.com |
| |
Studio not impressed by a PG-13 rating so opt for an Unrated theatrical release
|
|
|
 | 23rd December 2014
|
|
| See article [pdf] from
filmratings.com |
Little Boy is a 2015 USA / Mexico war comedy drama by Alejandro Monteverde. Starring Emily Watson, Kevin James and David Henrie.
 The film was initially rated PG-13 for some mature thematic material and violence.
The studio appealed to the C.A.R.A. Appeals board presumably hoping for a PG rating. Later the studio surrendered the PG-13 rating and decided to go for an unrated theatrical release. This seems to imply that the appeal was lost. |
| |
Indian film causes a little religious 'outrage'
|
|
|
 | 22nd December 2014
|
|
| See article
from indiatoday.intoday.in |
MSG: The Messenger of God is a 2015 India action comedy drama by Jeetu Arora and Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Ji Insan. Starring Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Ji Insan, Daniel Kaleb and Fllora Saini.
Guru Ji is a social reformer who works to help people fight against social evils.
Various Sikh organisations are 'outraged' about Gurmeet Ram Rahim's debut movie MSG: Messenger of God, and
are seeking a ban. The All India Sikh Students Federation (AISSF) said that it will soon move the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking a ban on the film. AISSF president Karnail Singh Peermohammad said even the film's teaser is controversial as
it shows the dera chief challenging people (Sikhs) with his dialogue Jo hamse takrayega (who will try to confront me). He said: We have demanded a complete ban on the screening of the film and have requested the
censor board, Punjab government and the Akal Takht to take immediate steps to get the film banned across the world. We are also moving a case in the court seeking a ban on the controversial film. We have even objected to the title
of the film. God's envoy cannot be a criminal. He is facing rape and murder allegations.
|
| |
BBFC slip in another film suffering BBFC advised category cuts for a 15 rated cinema release
|
|
|
 | 20th December 2014
|
|
| See article from
bbfc.co.uk |
Kingsman: the Secret Service is a 2015 UK action crime comedy by Matthew Vaughn. Starring Colin Firth, Michael Caine and Taron Egerton.
 UK: Passed 15 for strong bloody violence, strong language after BBFC advised
pre-cuts for:
The BBFC commented:
- This film was originally seen for advice in an unfinished version. The company was informed the film was likely to be classified 18, but that their requested 15 could be achieved by making some reductions in scenes of violence. When
the finished version was submitted for formal classification, reductions had been made and the film was passed 15.
Summary Notes A veteran secret agent takes a young upstart under his wing.
|
| |
BBFC advised category cuts made for a 12A rated cinema release
|
|
|
 | 19th December 2014
|
|
| See article from bbfc.co.uk
|
Taken 3 is a 2015 France action crime thriller by Olivier Megaton. Starring Liam Neeson, Famke Janssen and Maggie Grace.

UK: Passed 12A for moderate action violence, infrequent strong language after BBFC advised pre-cuts for:
The BBFC commented:
- This film was originally seen for advice in an incomplete form. The BBFC advised the company that the film was likely to receive a 15, but that their requested 12A could be achieved by making reductions in scenes of violence. When
the finished version was submitted for formal classification, those changes had been made and the film was classified 12A.
US Release Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and action, and for brief strong language. Hopefully uncut but there have been a couple of recent examples where BBFC advised category cuts have been adopted for
worldwide release. Summary Notes Bryan Mills, an Ex-government operative is accused of a ruthless murder he never committed or witnessed as he is tracked and pursued, Bryan Mills brings out his
particular set of skills to find the true killer and clear his name.
|
| |
There's more death and mayhem in cartoon's than in films for adults
|
|
|
| 17th December 2014
|
|
| See
article from
dailymail.co.uk |
It's something any Tom and Jerry viewer must have known for a long time. Children's cartoons are apparently more violent than films aimed at adults, and filled with murder and mayhem according to 'research'. Animated characters are more than
twice as likely to be killed off than actors in movies aimed at a grown up audience, the study claims. The authors of the research concluded: Rather than being innocuous and gentler alternatives to typical horror or
drama films, children's animated films are, in fact, hotbeds of murder and mayhem.
The study, published in the Christmas issue of the British Medical Journal, assessed the amount of violence young children might be exposed to when
watching films targeted at their age group: Parents of main characters were more than five times as likely to die in children's cartoons as they were in films targeted at adults.
Researchers Dr Ian
Colman and Dr James Kirkbride, from the University of Ottawa in Canada and University College London, also found no evidence to suggest that the level of violence has changed in children's films since Snow White. |
| |
Angelina Jolie's latest movie, Unbroken
|
|
|
 | 16th December 2014
|
|
| See article from
en.rocketnews24.com |
Unbroken is a 2014 USA action war biography by Angelina Jolie. Starring Jack O'Connell, Domhnall Gleeson and Jai Courtney.
 A chronicle of the life of Louis Zamperini, an Olympic
runner who was taken prisoner by Japanese forces during World War II.
Angelina Jolie's latest war movie, Unbroken , has been facing criticism recently from Japanese conservatives for its portrayals of brutality in World War II
prisoner of war camps. There is a movement among Japanese conservatives to ban the film inside Japan, describing its content as racist, immoral, and fabricated. Anything to do with the country's wartime legacy still stirs up controversy
within Japan and some leading politicians openly deny wartime events such as the Nanjing Massacre and claim that the forced prostitution of Korean women known as comfort women never occurred. Many Netizens have commented in support Jolie
and her vision, saying that she is simply showing the truth and that Japan can't hide from its past. However, there are some who pointed out that history has always written by the victors and details easily altered, and drew attention to the fact that
Japan was not the only nation to commit atrocities, adding that it is not fair that their country continues to be singled out for its actions in a war that ended over half a century ago. |
| |
|
|
|
 | 15th December 2014
|
|
|
Movie-Censorship reveals the cuts for a US MPAA PG-13 rating See article from movie-censorship.com |
| |
Indian sikhs to set up a unilaterally imposed film censorship board to ensure that movies and books provide positive propaganda for the religion
|
|
|
 | 14th December 2014
|
|
| See
article from
newindianexpress.com |
India Sikhs are attempting to unilaterally impose a new Sikh film censor board on Indian films to force them to portray the religion and its followers in a positive light. The Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) will constitute a Sikh
Censor Board to clear movies and books touching on the Sikh religion, history and culture. The board will ensure that films, books and entertainment provide positive propaganda for the religion. SGPC President Avtar Singh Makkar said,
The proposed board is aimed to ensure that the movies made in the future are in accordance with the Sikh 'rehat maryada' (code of conduct). The board will have 11 members, including Sikh intellectuals, historians and experts from
various fields, film experts and lawyers. Akal Takht Jathedar (High Priest) Gurbachan Singh said: The SGPC was asked to constitute a censor board. Any movie or book related to Sikh history and
culture has to be examined to avoid any controversies in the future.
However the unilateral imposition of religious censorship may not have any legal basis whatsoever. Central Board of Film Classification (CBFC) member Chander
Mukhi questioned the legal sanctity behind the proposed censor board by SGPC. He said: What legal status do they have? Under which law will they enact this board? CBFC is enacted by the Parliament. Any other
organisation will come up tomorrow and try to set its own censor board. We have different panels to watch the movies before they are released. The members are different every time. Any objectionable part in the film is cut down.
Makkar admitted that the board would have no legal sanctity:
Filmmakers who don't seek approval from the board would be responsible if there is any controversy. There have been instances in the past when films had to face strong protests.
|
| |
BBFC category cuts for Pompeii and Hercules are applied to worldwide releases
|
|
|
 | 12th
December 2014
|
|
| See article from
movie-censorship.com |
BBFC advised category cuts were made for UK cinema and home video releases of Paul WS Anderson's Pompeii . The BBFC commented at the time of the cinema release: This work was originally seen for advice.
The company was advised that the film was likely to receive a 15 certificate but that their preferred 12A classification could be achieved by making some changes.
The company was advised:
- to reduce stronger moments of violence where there was a dwelling on particular acts and
- to reduce the emphasis on blood on bladed weapons.
When the film was formally submitted, changes had been made which addressed these concerns. Consequently, the film was passed 12A. Now Movie-Censorship.com reveals that the BBFC advised category cuts were
adopted for US PG-13 rated release and also for FSK 12 rated release in Germany. Presumably the BBFC cuts therefore apply worldwide. BBFC advised category cuts similarly found there way into the worldwide Theatrical Version of Brett Ratner's Hercules
. But at least in this case there was an Extended Version released on US Blu-ray which restored the cuts. The Extended Version is MPAA Unrated in the US but has not been released in the UK. |
| |
|
|
|
 |
9th December 2014
|
|
|
An interesting article detailing with the two versions of the film and touching on the BBFC censorship See
article from denofgeek.us |
| |
|
|
|
 | 7th
December 2014
|
|
|
An opinion piece on PG-13 backed up with a good history of the rating. By Chris Klimek See article from
thedissolve.com |
| |
|
|
|
 | 5th December
2014
|
|
|
How Kevin Smith Avoided an NC-17 Sex Scene See article from vulture.com |
| |
House on the Edge of the Park
|
|
|
 | 2nd December
2014
|
|
| See OFLC Annual Report 2014 [pdf] from
classificationoffice.govt.nz |
House on the Edge of the Park is a 1980 Italian horror thriller by Ruggero Deodato With David Hess and Annie Belle.

The New Zealand film censor has reported the ban of a proposed re-release in its 2014 Annual Report: This film is deemed objectionable because it tends to promote and support violence and coercion to compel
women to submit to sexual conduct. The film is dominated by numerous scenes of sexual violence. It opens on a graphic scene of rape that is not supported by context. The narrative then follows two men as they terrorise a group of
people, particularly the female members of the group, who they repeatedly subject to sexual violence. Gratuitous lingering shots of nudity and other cinematic effects such as romantic music and lighting during the scenes of assault and rape support this
purpose. The sexual violence is not contextualized or explored beyond the superficial presentation of the conduct. The victims appear aroused by, unaffected by and thus collusive in the violence perpetrated against them; this feeds into the intrinsic
rape myth dialogue of the publication. Viewers are relentlessly exposed to titillating images that eroticise sexual humiliation and violence. All of these factors invite viewers to become complicit in events and to take vicarious
pleasure in the men's misogyny and the victims' humiliation and dehumanisation. Further, due to the publication's proliferation of rape myths and relentless eroticized presentation of sexual violence, people who have been subjected to any form of sexual
abuse will be re-traumatized by the film's depictions of violence and sexual violence. The legitimization of these rape myths also irredeemably serves to validate viewers' misconceptions of sexual violence and thus their real world response to sexual
violence. The Classification Office is aware that cut versions of the feature have been released in the United Kingdom and has considered whether a different classification might be possible if excisions were made. However the
distributor has notified the Classification Office that any excisions will not be made, so in this instance they have not been recommended.
For comparison in the UK, the film was once banned, but is now cut Banned by
the BBFC for 1981 cinema release. Banned as a video nasty in 1983. Unbanned after 12 minutes of cuts in 2002. Cuts reduced to 43s in 2011.
And of course in the US the film is uncut and MPAA Unrated for
|
| |
High School DxD
|
|
|
 | 1st December
2014
|
|
| See OFLC Annual Report 2014 [pdf] from
classificationoffice.govt.nz |
High School DxD is a Japan action anime comedy Starring Jamie Marchi, Terri Doty and Kyle Phillips.

The story follows Issei Hyodo, a dim-witted, lecherous second-year high school student who is killed by a girl on his first date ever. Issei is reincarnated as a devil, and from that day forward, he serves as an
underling of Riasu, a high-level devil who is also the prettiest girl on Issei's campus.
The New Zealand film censor has reported the ban in its 2014 Annual Report: The DVD is classified
objectionable. The publication is the first set of episodes of a Japanese anime series set in high school about a sex-obsessed schoolboy who becomes part of the supernatural world. The DVD tends to promote and support the sexual exploitation of young
persons. All of the young female characters are highly sexualised and fetishised. They are relentlessly depicted as nude or in limited sexualised clothing. Focus is made on their breasts and youthful bodies in such a way as to titillate and arouse the
viewer. Their youthfulness is emphasised by the high school setting, their school uniforms and their engagement in high school activities. Episodes are separated by photo stills of the female characters sexually posing, reminiscent of adult pornographic
material. The credits feature these characters performing strip tease. The scenes are constructed wholly for the sexual benefit of the viewer. The main purpose of this treatment is to reinforce the notion that young persons are sexually desirable and
available. It encourages and legitimises the pursuit of young persons as viable adult sexual partners.
By way of a comparison, the BBFC passed the DVD 15 uncut for strong sex references, nudity, strong language, violence, sexual
threat for:
|
| |
Australian film censors review international research on public attitudes to film classification
|
|
|
 | 30th
November 2014
|
|
| See Efficacy of film and computer game classification categories and consumer advice [pdf]
from classification.gov.au |
The Australian Commonwealth is currently conducting a program of classification-related social research. As a first step in the implementation of the research program, a review of relevant public
opinion research and literature was undertaken. The review included public opinion research from Australia and overseas on perceptions, awareness, use and understanding of classification categories and consumer advice and alignment of classification
categories and consumer advice with community standards. Relevant academic studies were also included in this report. Review conclusions are as follows:
- There is broad backing for and confidence in classification systems, both in Australia and in comparable jurisdictions.
- There is a high awareness of the NCS and categories/ markings amongst
the Australian public; however, quantitative research undertaken in this area is dated.
- Understanding of classification categories and markings amongst the Australian public (and amongst the public in comparable
jurisdictions) appears to be limited, with significant variation observed across categories/ markings.
- Understanding of mid-level classifications amongst the Australian public is especially problematic, and sometimes
compares unfavourably to the levels observed in comparable jurisdictions.
- The Australian publics' understanding of the consumer advice that accompanies classification symbols is incomplete, and sometimes compares
unfavourably to the level of understanding observed in other jurisdictions.
- Using separate classifications for sexually explicit films and other adults only films can cause confusion.
-
Despite broad community and stakeholder support for the existence of a classification system, views on the RC category (and similar) are mixed.
- Classification decisions for films and computer
games are broadly aligned with community standards, both in Australia and in comparable jurisdictions.
- Parents (and other primary caregivers) are more supportive of classification and rating systems when compared to
the general public.
- Young people across jurisdictions are, on the whole, knowledgeable and supportive of classification systems; however, self-reported support may not translate into actual use of the system to avoid
(or prepare to view) material, especially amongst older children and adolescents.
- Use of classification and rating information amongst the general public (especially parents) appears to be relatively high across
jurisdictions, with Australia comparing favourably; however use amongst parents may be overestimated.
- Empirical evidence assessing potential for harm should be critically considered in conjunction with data assessing
community standards.
- There is widespread agreement amongst community members that certain content is likely to be harmful (especially to children and young people); however the relative potential for harm is thought
to be mediated by: Frequency; Duration; and Context.
- There is broad community support for the inclusion of selected fetishes in higher-level, restricted content.
- There are
concerns that exposure to gambling and non-illicit drug use (i.e. alcohol and tobacco) via films and computer games may be harmful, both at an individual and societal level. It is therefore worth considering (a) the inclusion of a specific Gambling
element within the NCS, and (b) the expansion in scope of the Drug use element to including portrayals of smoking and alcohol consumption.
|
| |
New Zealand's film censor publishes annual report
|
|
|
 | 30th November 2014
|
|
| See OFLC Annual Report 2014 [pdf] from
classificationoffice.govt.nz |
A total of 2,259 publications were submitted for classification this year, 2,032 publications were examined and 2,060 decisions registered. Crown submissions increased by 48% from the previous year while commercial work
dropped by 8%. This drop was expected to be larger with the main New Zealand distributor of adult DVDs withdrawing from the market. However, during this period local distributors of online movie and TV series began submitting product for classification.
In terms of Crown work a 48% increase from the previous year in Crown submissions was largely driven by Police and the Department of Internal Affairs enforcement activity. As a result, the number of publications banned this year
more than doubled from the previous year's result. Of the 320 publications banned, 88% dealt with the sexual exploitation of children and young persons.
|
| |
|
|
|
 | 29th November 2014
|
|
|
Could R-Rated Violent Movies Actually Be Good For Younger Viewers? See
article from moviepilot.com |
| |
Thai cinemas cancel showings of Mockingjay as its symbology chimes with those opposing military dictatorship
|
|
|
 | 25th November 2014
|
|
| 20th November 2014. See article from
bangkokpost.com See Third
Hunger Games film poses biggest protest threat yet to Thai government from theconversation.com |
Managers at Bangkok's Lido and Scala cinemas have decided not to show the movie The Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 1 for fear of a political backlash. The management of Apex group, which operates the theatres, told the Bangkok Post it had
received a phone call asking for 200 tickets for the film's premiere on Thursday noon at Scala theatre, and that they be sent by mail. It found out later the tickets were being given out for free from a Facebook page. The League of Liberal
Thammasat for Democracy posted on its Facebook that it would give 160 tickets for the movie premiere at Scala under its Raise Three Fingers, Bring Popcorn and Go to the Theatre campaign. It also asked its friends to comment on How does the
Capitol resemble Bangkok? - the winning commentators would get 80 tickets for free. As of 6.46pm on Wednesday there were 241 comments to the post. Apex said authorities had met with management to talk about the film but claimed its decision to
drop the show had nothing to do with what happened to the military ruler Prayut Chan-o-cha in Khon Kaen. His talk there was interrupted by five students. The five wore anti coup t-shirts and gave the general the three-finger salute from the Hunger
Games series of movies before being whiskered away by police and soldiers to a military camp. A security official said they were detained at the camp for attitude adjustment. Update: UN gives Thailand a 3 fingered
salute 25th November 2014. See article from bangkokpost.com
The United Nations has criticised the Thailand's military dictators for arresting students flashing the signature protest gesture from The Hunger Games while the film's makers have said they are concerned for the young activists. Fallout
from the detention of three students outside two Bangkok theatres continued with the military's 'Prime Minister' Prayut Chan-o-cha saying he felt unthreatened by The Hunger Games' three-fingered protest against totalitarian rule, but nonetheless warned
people against using it. , Gen Prayut told reporters: I don't know whether it is illegal or not but it could jeopardise their futures. I appreciate their courage but they should use their courage in the right
ways.
His comments came as the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in Southeast Asia criticised the authorities for a recent spate of instances in which people were led away for questioning after making the
salute that has become a symbol of defiance for anti-coup protesters. Local OHCHR representative Matilda Bogner told AFP: This case is the latest illustration of a worrying pattern of human rights violations, which has
the effect of suppressing critical and independent voices, l
The three students apprehended for flashing the three-finger salute were released without charges. Meanwhile the military government announces
indefinite martial law Perhaps while the media are distracted by the Hunger Games story, the country's justice minister announced that martial law is here to stay. Justice Minister Paiboon Koomchaya told Reuters:
Martial law is necessary and we cannot lift it because the government and junta need it as the army's tool. We are not saying that martial law will stay in place for 50 years, no this is not it, we just ask that it remain in place
for now, indefinitely. And meanwhile the lese majeste law is used to outlaw criticism A military court in Thailand has sentenced a web editor to four and a half years in jail for publishing an article
five years ago that it said insulted the nation's king. Rungwong edited the Thai E-News website, which is now blocked by censors. The article, published in 2009, was written by Giles Ji Ungpakorn, a radical Thai intellectual and former university
political scientist who fled to Britain that year. Thailand's lese-majesty law is considered the harshest in the world, with the accused facing jail terms of three to 15 years if found guilty. And the definition of insult is drawn very widely.
Suggesting changes to Thailand's political status quo can readily be considered a criticism of the state and hence an insult to the king's stewardship of Thailand. Update: And human rights criticisms get blocked 1st
December 2014. See article from bangkokpost.com
The Thai government has blocked access to the Thailand page of the Human Rights Watch (HRW) website after receiving harsh criticism from the organisation. In recent weeks HRW have heavily criticised Thailand's military government for its
crackdown on dissent. The fact that the [junta] feels the need to block Human Rights Watch's Thailand webpage means that we must be doing something right, said Brad Adams, HRW's Asia director. |
| |
Stallone says Expendables 4 will be R rated
|
|
|
 | 24th November 2014
|
|
| See article from
craveonline.com |
Expendables 1 and 2 established a hard edge to the Stallone's action series but the 3rd episode was toned down to PG-13 in search of a larger audience. This didn't turn out to be the case but this could also be down to audience fatigue often
associated with multiple sequels. Either way Stallone has said in an interview with CraveOnline that th enext film with return to being R rated. Stallone was asked: Do you think future Expendables movies should be R-rated from the get go?
He replied: I believe it was a horrible miscalculation on everyone's part in trying to reach a wider audience, but in doing such, diminish the violence that the audience expects. I'm quite certain it won't happen
again.
|
| |
|
|
|
 | 20th November 2014
|
|
|
Movie-Censorship reveals that the UK release of Found is cut by 99s so must have suffered pre-cuts in addition to the 4s of BBFC cuts. See article from
movie-censorship.com |
| |
The Daily Mail, the book's author and SaferMedia all whinge at the BBFC for its consumer advice for the movie, Paddington
|
|
|
 | 18th November 2014
|
|
| Thanks to Nick See article from
bbc.co.uk See article
from dailymail.co.uk |
Paddington is a 2014 UK / France family comedy by Paul King. Starring Hugh Bonneville, Sally Hawkins and Julie Walters.

A young Peruvian bear with a passion for all things British travels to London in search of a home. Finding himself lost and alone at Paddington Station, he begins to realize that city life is not all he had imagined
- until he meets the kindly Brown family, who read the label around his neck ('Please look after this bear. Thank you.') and offer him a temporary haven. It looks as though his luck has changed until this rarest of bears catches the eye of a museum
taxidermist. The BBFC Just passed the film PG uncut for cinema release with the consumer advice: dangerous behaviour, mild threat, innuendo, infrequent mild bad language.
But a little
earlier, the consumer advice had read dangerous behaviour, mild threat, mild sex references, mild bad language.
The BBFC changed the wording of its guidance after the Daily Mail ran a story about
the PG rating for the film. It seems that the Paddington author Michael Bond was totally amazed at the term mild sex references used by the BBFC. Bond told the Daily Mail: I'd be very upset. I might not
sleep well tonight. I can't imagine what the sex references are. It doesn't enter into it with the books, certainly.'
After an approach from the film's distributor the BBFC altered the term mild sex references to innuendo
. The distributor also asked for clarity to the frequency of mild bad language, and the BBFC duly obliged by adding the descriptor, infrequent. The film's director Paul King said he had expected the BBFC to issue a PG rating:
I'm not surprised about that but I don't think it's a PG for sexiness. That I would find very odd, he said.
The Daily Mail also a dragged up a trivial sound bite from Pippa Smith, of the SaferMedia
campaign. She said: There should be absolutely nothing threatening, sexual or dangerous about Paddington. If there is, it should be cut.
For a full description of what the BBFC are alluding to here
is the BBFC Insight. (which still uses the heading 'sex')
Imitable Behaviour There are infrequent scenes of dangerous behaviour, including Paddington hiding from a villain inside a refrigerator and riding on a skateboard while holding on to a bus, as well as a brief scene of a
boy strapping fireworks to his shoes. Threat There are occasional sequences of mild threat when Paddington is chased by the villain who threatens to kill and stuff him, as well as a brief sequence in
which Paddington lies unconscious on a table while a taxidermist prepares their tools nearby. There is also a short scene in a jungle when Paddington and his family run for shelter during an earthquake with trees falling around them.
Sex There is some mild innuendo, including a comic sequence in which a man disguised as a woman is flirted with by another man. Language There is a
single mumbled use of bloody .
Update: Panto 27th November 2014. See
article from
digitalspy.co.uk Paddington producer David Heyman has spoken about the unfair controversy surrounding the film's BBFC rating. Heyman told Digital Spy:
When I first heard, it was with a little bit of disbelief. There's nothing in the film that is more inappropriate, or has more innuendo, than panto. They're doing their job, and I understand, but I
think this time they were a little unfair. It's good old fun, and it's playful.
|
| |
An uncut 15 rated Audio Descriptive Version suggests that the UK will see an uncut home video release
|
|
|
 | 15th November 2014
|
|
| |
The Maze Runner is a 2014 USA action Sci-Fi mystery by Wes Ball. Starring Dylan O'Brien, Will Poulter and Kaya Scodelario.

UK: The Audio Descriptive Version was passed 15 uncut for intense scenes, strong threat, violence for:
- 2014 Twentieth Century Fox video
UK Censorship History In the US the film was uncut and MPAA PG-13 rated for thematic elements and intense sequences of sci-fi violence and action, including some disturbing images for:
However BBFC 43s of category cuts were required for a 12A rated 2014 cinema release The appearance of a 15 rated Audio Descriptive Version suggest that there will now be an uncut release on UK video although it is not yet clear exactly what
will be released on UK DVD and Blu-ray. Summary Notes A group of boys, with no memories of their past lives, must escape a massive maze infested with deadly creatures.
|
| |
US drama by John Herzfeld has two versions, passed 15 and 12, available for UK video release
|
|
|
 | 15th November 2014
|
|
| |
Collection (aka Reach Me and Out of Sight) is a 2014 USA drama by John Herzfeld. Starring Danny Aiello, Rick Aiello and Jillian Barberie.

UK: Presumably the cut PG-13 version was passed 12 for strong language, moderate violence, threat, drug use for:
- 2014 Signature Entertainment video titled Collection
Censorship History Originally R Rated by the MPAA but the film was later cut for a PG-13 rating. The BBFC passed the two versions 15 and 12 respectively without BBFC cuts. The film seems to have been cut fro PG-13 by
about 3:22s which achieved a lowering of BBFC advice from strong violence to moderate violence. The US home video release is advertised on Amazon with an R rating as follows: US: Uncut and MPAA R rated for some
violence, language and brief drug use for:
Summary Notes A drama centered on a group of people who all have a connection to a self-help book authored by a reclusive former football coach.
|
|
|