|
MPAA upholds PG-13 rating on appeal for Max Steel movie targeting young children
|
|
|
 | 30th September 2016
|
|
| See article from slashfilm.com |
Max Steel is a 2016 UK / USA action Sci-Fi adventure by Stewart Hendler. Starring Ben Winchell, Josh Brener and Maria Bello.
 Max Steel is based on the popular Mattel kids action figure line of toys. While the
film was developed for the family friendly PG rating release, the MPAA ended up giving the movie a more restrictive PG-13 rating for some sci-fi action violence. This could have a financial impact for a film trying to attract audiences of
younger children, so the studio appealed the rating. However the Classification and Ratings Administration have now turned down the appeal and upheld the PG-13 rating. It's probably a bit late for remedial scissor work as the movie is scheduled to
open in the US on 14th October. |
|
Speculation that Louis Theroux's My Scientology Movie has been banned in Ireland over fears about the country's blasphemy law
|
|
|
 | 28th September 2016
|
|
| See article from newstatesman.com
|
My Scientology Movie is a 2015 UK / USA documentary by John Dower. Starring Rob Alter, Tom Cruise and Paz de la Huerta.
 Louis Theroux documents his investigation into what
goes on behind the scenes of the infamous church of scientology.
Film distributors In Ireland have decided not to screen Louis Theroux's My Scientology Movie. And the speculation is that the country's recently enacted blasphemy law
could be used to stir up hassle for the distributors. The law, part of the 2009 Defamation Act states that any person who publishes or utters blasphemous matter shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable upon conviction on indictment to
a fine not exceeding euro 25,000 . Blasphemous matter is defined as anything that is insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion , and that intends to cause outrage. The law also states that blasphemy laws do not apply
to an organisation or cult that prioritises making financial profit or manipulates followers and new recruits. Scientology isn't officially recognised as a church in Ireland, but it's unclear whether or not it counts as a religion under the acts
definitions. But even if Scientology doesn't count as a religion, then they can still employ expensive lawyers to make the claim anyway, and that it would then take equally expensive lawyers to counter such a claim. |
|
Gore film innovator has partaken in his last feast
|
|
|
 | 27th September 2016
|
|
| See article from avn.com
See article from en.wikipedia.org |
Horror film director Herschel Gordon Lewis has died at his home in Florida. The cause of death was not immediately disclosed. He was 87 years of age. By 1961, Lewis had made the acquaintance of softcore film producer/director David Friedman, and the
pair collaborated on a series of so-called nudie cuties the first of which was Living Venus (1961), a send-up of Hugh Hefner and the founding of Playboy magazine. Several more nudie-cuties followed over the next two years, including the
first nudie musical, Goldilocks and the Three Bares . In 1963, Lewis directed his first (and most famous) horror movie, Blood Feast , considered the first splatter film and described by film critic Roger Ebert as a terrible
film, and a historically important one, too --n part because Lewis could sell his horror fare to drive-in movie theaters that wouldn't (or legally weren't allowed) to play his nudie-cuties. Blood Feast gave Lewis the great accolade of being
banned as a Video Nasty during the great moral panic of the early 80's. His filmography from 1963 reads
1963 | Bell, Bare and Beautiful | credited as Lewis H. Gordon | Boin-n-g! | credited as Lewis H. Gordon
| Blood Feast | | Goldilocks and the Three Bares | credited as Lewis H. Gordon | Scum of the Earth! | credited as Lewis H. Gordon
| 1964 | Two Thousand Maniacs! | | Moonshine Mountain | |
1965 | Monster A Go-Go | uncredited as director | Color Me Blood Red | |
1967 | A Taste of Blood | | The Gruesome Twosome | | Something Weird |
| The Girl, the Body, and the Pill | | Blast-Off Girls | | 1968 |
She-Devils on Wheels | | The Alley Tramp | credited as Armand Parys | Just for the Hell of It | |
How to Make a Doll | | Suburban Roulette | | 1969 | The Ecstasies of Women |
credited as Mark Hansen | Linda and Abilene | credited as Mark Hansen | 1970 | Miss Nymphet's Zap-In
| credited as Sheldon Seymour | The Wizard of Gore | | 1971 | This Stuff'll Kill Ya! | |
1972 | Black Love | porn film; credited as R.L. Smith | Year of the Yahoo! | |
The Gore Gore Girls | | 2002 | Blood Feast 2: All U Can Eat | | 2009
| The Uh-Oh! Show | |
Coincidently Arrow Films are just about to release a Blu-ray/DVD Combo set of 14 major films from Lewis' career. The Herschell Gordon Lewis Feast is collection of films by Herschell Gordon Lewis consisting of:
- Blood Feast
- Scum of the Earth
- Two Thousand Maniacs!
- Moonshine Mountain
- Color Me Blood Red
- Something Weird
- The Gruesome Twosome
- A Taste of Blood
- She-Devils on Wheels
- Just
for the Hell of It
- How to Make a Doll
- The Wizard of Gore
- The Gore Gore Girls
- This Stuff'll Kill Ya!
See the Herschell Gordon Lewis Feast (RB) Blu-ray/(R2) DVD Combo at UK Amazon released on
24th October 2016 |
|
Sony waste their time appealing for a 15 rating after the New Zealand film censor rants about the violence in Fede Alvarez's Don't Breathe
|
|
|
 | 25th September 2016
|
|
| See press release from
classificationoffice.govt.nz |
Don't Breathe is a 2016 USA horror thriller by Fede Alvarez. Starring Jane Levy, Dylan Minnette and Stephen Lang.
 Rocky, a young woman wanting to start a better life for
her and her sister, agrees to take part in the robbery of a house owned by a wealthy blind man with her boyfriend Money and their friend Alex. But when the blind man turns out to be a serial killer, the group must find a way to escape his home before
they become his newest victims.
New Zealand's Film and Literature Board of Review has upheld the Chief Censor's R18 classification of the Sony Pictures film, Don't Breathe. The classification also carries the warning Contains
violence, sexual violence and offensive language . Sony Pictures appealed the Chief Censor's decision to the Film and Literature Board of Review, and made a submission for a lower classification. In its decision, the Board of Review
noted that their consideration of the movie comes shortly after the government's announcement that domestic violence in New Zealand: Is at such a level and of such concern that significant political and social measures
are necessary to address this problem. Movies which depict extreme violence and sexual violence towards women are of concern to New Zealand society as a whole.
Chief Censor Dr Andrew Jack said in a press release that he welcomes the
Board of Review decision, stating that it helps increase New Zealanders' awareness of violent entertainment and supports their right to choose what they and their families are exposed to. He went on to rant that the Classification Office is viewing an
increasing amount of horrific and gratuitous sexual violence in mainstream entertainment targeting young people. He concluded: Violent media is helping to shape a violent New Zealand. In its submission, Sony said they did not agree with the
original descriptive note, assigned by the Classification Office, that the movie contained sexual violence . Sony stated there was no sexual violence in the film. They sought an RP15 classification. For comparison:
- In the UK, the BBFC rated the film 15 uncut for strong violence, sexual threat, strong language
- In the US it was MPAA R rated for terror, violence, disturbing content, and language including sexual references.
|
|
Ben-Hur censored in Malaysia
|
|
|
 | 24th September 2016
|
|
| 18th September 2016. See article
from themalaymailonline.com |
Ben-Hur is a 2016 USA historical adventure drama by Timur Bekmambetov. Starring Jack Huston, Toby Kebbell and Rodrigo Santoro.
 The epic story of Judah Ben-Hur (Jack Huston), a prince
falsely accused of treason by his adopted brother, an officer in the Roman army. After years at sea, Judah returns to his homeland to seek revenge, but finds redemption.
Malayisia's Film Censorship Board (LPF) said it was not to blame
for the censorship of scenes involving Jesus Christ from the Hollywood remake of Ben-Hur . LPF chairman Datuk Abdul Halim Abdul Hamid further said he did not recall seeing such scenes from the movie submitted, adding that it was possible
the Malaysian version is a different version from those shown elsewhere. He told Malay Mail Online: Maybe, but not by us, probably by producers when they sent the film to Malaysia, they already cut the scenes,
they know (there's) some sensitivities.
Halim said he was certain that the board did not remove the scenes that included Jesus, which were pivotal to the plot of the story. Local viewers had taken to Facebook to complain of
censorship of Ben-Hur, with scenes of Jesus forming key plot points allegedly taken out. One Facebook user, Jasmine Sia, who watched the film on Friday night, said no scenes involving Jesus was shown at all. she told Malay Mail Online:
I felt cheated. The novel from which this movie is adapted is Ben-Hur: A Tale of Christ . It means Jesus is central to the plot. It was censored so much the storyline made no sense! How did Judah's mother and sister get
cured from leprosy? No, they did not show anything with regards to healing. They just appeared at the end of the movie healed. That's why it made no sense.
The local distributor of the film, United
International Pictures (UIP) Malaysia, acknowledged on its official Facebook page that the local edition was not identical to that shown elsewhere, after one user named Jerry Terry Derulo pointed out that the runtime here was 11 minutes shorter than
listed on movie database IMDB. Update: Export Version 24th September 2016. See
article from themalaymailonline.com Universal has confirmed that there is a
special export version of Ben-Hur for intolerant countries that ban the depiction of other religions to their own. The latest Hollywood remake of Ben-Hur has an export version that has been edited to remove scenes featuring Jesus Christ. A Universal
spokesman explained: We submitted into the Censor board a Studio pre-edited version which was available for countries that do not allow the depiction of prophets on film whether by law or due to local sensitivities.
We learned from past titles submitted to the Malaysian Film Censorship Board (LPF) that no Prophets are allowed to be depicted on film. In Malaysia, previous films such as Noah and Exodus which depicted prophets were banned by
LPF.
UIP Malaysia said the Malaysian version which was pre-cut to a total running time of 114 minutes is also available for other countries. LPF chairman Datuk Abdul Halim Abdul Hamid confirmed that LPF adopts the Department of
Islamic Development Malaysia's (Jakim) guidelines for films, adding that the body tasked with overseeing religious matters and even the police are sometimes invited to view films together. He added: But we also have
some guidelines from Jakim that any films cannot portray all the prophets or the angels, even the Satan in the context of Islam. Anything mentioned in Quran cannot be visually portrayed in the form of character, figure or drawing.
|
|
Ben-Hur censored in Malaysia
|
|
|
 | 18th September 2016
|
|
| See article from
themalaymailonline.com |
Ben-Hur is a 2016 USA historical adventure drama by Timur Bekmambetov. Starring Jack Huston, Toby Kebbell and Rodrigo Santoro.
 The epic story of Judah Ben-Hur (Jack Huston), a prince
falsely accused of treason by his adopted brother, an officer in the Roman army. After years at sea, Judah returns to his homeland to seek revenge, but finds redemption.
Malayisia's Film Censorship Board (LPF) said it was not to blame
for the censorship of scenes involving Jesus Christ from the Hollywood remake of Ben-Hur . LPF chairman Datuk Abdul Halim Abdul Hamid further said he did not recall seeing such scenes from the movie submitted, adding that it was possible
the Malaysian version is a different version from those shown elsewhere. He told Malay Mail Online: Maybe, but not by us, probably by producers when they sent the film to Malaysia, they already cut the scenes,
they know (there's) some sensitivities.
Halim said he was certain that the board did not remove the scenes that included Jesus, which were pivotal to the plot of the story. Local viewers had taken to Facebook to complain of
censorship of Ben-Hur, with scenes of Jesus forming key plot points allegedly taken out. One Facebook user, Jasmine Sia, who watched the film on Friday night, said no scenes involving Jesus was shown at all. she told Malay Mail Online:
I felt cheated. The novel from which this movie is adapted is Ben-Hur: A Tale of Christ . It means Jesus is central to the plot. It was censored so much the storyline made no sense! How did Judah's mother and sister get
cured from leprosy? No, they did not show anything with regards to healing. They just appeared at the end of the movie healed. That's why it made no sense.
The local distributor of the film, United
International Pictures (UIP) Malaysia, acknowledged on its official Facebook page that the local edition was not identical to that shown elsewhere, after one user named Jerry Terry Derulo pointed out that the runtime here was 11 minutes shorter than
listed on movie database IMDB. |
|
Pakistan, still banned from hosting international cricket, bans film about rescue of Indian cricketer kidnapped before a match with Pakistan
|
|
|
 | 31st July 2016
|
|
| See article from fabnewz.com |
Dishoom is a 2016 India action crime comedy by Rohit Dhawan. Starring Nargis Fakhri, Akshay Kumar and Jacqueline Fernandez.
 When India's top batsman Viraj goes missing in Middle
East, two cops Kabir Shergill and Junaid Ansari from either side of Arabian Sea team for a 36-hours man hunt before the final match between India and Pakistan.
Rohit Dhawan's film Dishoom has been banned in Pakistan. According to
reports, Pakistan's censor board contended that the film projected the country in a poor light. Pakistan has a bit of history of banning films where Pakistanis/muslims are the villains of the piece. Actor Varun Dhawan said that the film does not
intend to malign any country's reputation, or address any religious issues for that matter: What we are trying to show is that for certain people money is their religion. It's not being an Indian, Pakistani, Hindu,
Muslim or Christian. In the capitalistic world that we live in, money is the biggest driving force for most crimes.
Some reports state that the films have also faced censor troubles in some of the Gulf states due to inappropriate
representation. Update: Referred to government 2nd August 2016. From tribune.com.pk CBFC Chairman Mobashir Hasan said that after the refusal to award a certificate the decision has now been forwarded to the
Ministry of Information, Broadcasting and Heritage for further guidance in the matter: The ministry will decide the fate of the film. Technically the film is not banned but is not being exhibited in the cinemas.
|
|
Indian film censors ban gay film, Ka Bodyscapes
|
|
|
 | 27th July 2016
|
|
| See article from thehindu.com |
Ka Bodyscapes is a 2016 India / USA gay drama by Jayan Cherian. Starring Adhithi, Tinto Arayani and Arundhathi.
 Three young people, Haris, a gay painter; Vishnu, a
rural kabaddi player and their friend Sia, an activist who refuse to conform to dominant norms of femininity, struggle to find space and happiness in a conservative Indian City.
India's Central Board of Film Classification (CBFC),
taking umbrage at what it decided are vulgar and offensive scenes in it, has banned the Malayalam film Ka Bodyscapes produced and directed by New York-based film-maker Jayan Cherian. In a rejection letter sent to the maker of the film, A.
Prathibha, regional officer of the CBFC in Thiruvananthapuram, wrote: The revising committee felt that the entire content of the Malayalam feature film Ka Bodyscapes is ridiculing, insulting and humiliating Hindu
religion, in particular portraying Hindu Gods in poor light. Derogatory words are used against women. The Hindu God 'Hanuman' is shown as coming in the books titled 'I am Gay' and other homosexual books. The film has also references to lady masturbating,
highlighting 'gay' by many 'gay' posters. The film offends human sensibilities by vulgarity, obscenity and depravity.
The CBFC regional office had earlier referred the film, which is woven around a gay love story, to the review
committee. It transferred the review screening to Chennai and postponed it on the eve of the screening scheduled for July 5. Finally, as the maker accused the board of dragging its feet on certifying the film, the review committee watched it on July 15.
Cherian accused the board of suffering from homophobia: Their basic attitude towards and idea of same sex love is that it's vulgar and obscene.
He said he will move the High Court of Kerala
for relief. |
|
|
|
|
 | 24th July 2016
|
|
|
Oliver Stone's new movie Snowden had a predictably tough time getting finance from corporate America See article
from bangkokpost.com |
|
Horror Channel in a spot of bother as the BBFC requires cuts for the pre-cut version of I Spit On Your Grave shown by the channel which then attracted complaints to Ofcom
|
|
|
 | 22nd July 2016
|
|
| |
I Spit on Your Grave is a 2010 USA crime horror thriller by Steven R Monroe. Starring Sarah Butler, Jeff Branson and Andrew Howard.
 A writer who is brutalized during her cabin retreat
seeks revenge on her attackers, who left her for dead.
UK: A pre-cut version was passed 18 for sexual violence, bloody violence after 53s of BBFC compulsory cuts for:
- 2016 AMC Networks International UK [Material also pre-cut by company.] video
The BBFC commented:
- Cuts were required during scenes of sexual violence in order to remove potentially harmful material (in this case shots of nudity that tend to eroticse sexual violence and shots of humiliation that tend to endorse sexual violence by
encouraging viewer complicity in sexual humiliation and rape). The cuts were made in accordance with BBFC Guidelines, policy and the Video Recordings Act 1984.
The BBFC confirmed in an email to Glenn that the Horror Channel Version contained additional material to the cut UK version, and so had to be cut to bring it in line with the cut UK version: This version of I Spit
on Your Grave is a re-edited, reduced version compared to the submission classified in 2010. These changes were made by the films distributor prior to the film being submitted to the BBFC. The BBFC required that footage that was previously cut from the
2010 submission, but that had not already been removed by the films distributor, to also be removed.
Background to this version Earlier this year in May, Ofcom announced that it was investigating a complaint about a
broadcast of the remake of I Spit on Your Grave on the Horror Channel in March. The sequel to the remake I Spit on Your Grave 2 was being shown at the same time and it was noted that maybe this could be involved in the complaint too. schnittberichte.com also pointed out that a January showing of I Spit on Your Grave wasn't actually a BBFC approved version. The website concludes that the Horror Channel did its own edit, which although cut, was stronger than the BBFC version.
Surely this complaint, and the possibility of interim versions, is behind this week's BBFC new classification of I Spit on Your Grave and I Spit on Your Grave 2, submitted by AMC Networks International, owners of Horror Channel. The
BBFC passed this latest version of I Spit on Your Grave as 18 after 53s of BBFC cuts for sexual violence, bloody violence. So perhaps these leaves the Horror Channel in the lurch with Ofcom. Ofcom will no doubt find that the channel
should have shown the BBFC cut version. The channel will now be in breach of the rules of the land explicitly requiring that TV channels show BBFC approved versions (or versions where the BBFC have given the nod that they would no longer require cuts if
resubmitted). Comment Thanks to Glenn who disagrees with the BBFC claims that cuts are required. He wrote to the censors saying: Being in possession of a full, uncensored version, I
have been fortunate to bear witness to the director's intended vision. The board should not be cutting this film. It is incredibly insulting and hypocritical that the board are more than happy to pass "Baise Moi" uncut (and rightly so!) but
insist on censoring a film that will have appeal to the masses, rather than just the middle class art brigade. Of further insult is the blatant ignoring of public opinion that you, ever so proudly, claim to shape your guidelines. On this very site, the
previous public consultation undertook by the BBFC is there for all to read. However, some of the viewers felt that the film could easily pass uncut given the second half of the film and her retribution to the culprits. This clearly counterbalances the
graphic scenes of rape. You seemed to have ignored the advice of the general public and proceeded to do as you wish. Your claims of "eroticised sexual violence" is worrying to say the least. I've yet to meet, or speak
to, anybody who found any of the films erotic or eroticised. This is something that obviously only the board is seeing. No one else is. Sorry? Who are you protecting, again? It is also worth noting that the OFLC, the Australian
censorship body, has passed all the films uncut and their guidelines are stricter than yours! Plus, there is NO recorded evidence that any harm has come to anybody as a result of these films being available uncut anywhere in the world. And the majority
of people in Britain have seen the uncut versions of them. Still no reports of harm.
|
|
Suicide Squad gets a BBFC 15 rating in the UK, a higher rating than most countries
|
|
|
 | 20th July 2016
|
|
| See article from bbfc.co.uk |
Suicide Squad is a 2016 USA action crime fantasy by David Ayer. Starring Margot Robbie, Cara Delevingne and Will Smith.
 A secret government agency run by Amanda Waller, named
A.R.G.U.S creates a task force comprising super villains, the "Suicide Squad". They are assigned to execute dangerous tasks in exchange for shorter prison sentences. Even the word 'suicide' is a bit much for our film censors.
Having a belief that viewers are affected by the films they see, then 'suicide' in films appealing to children, conjures up the need to be ultra sensitive and cautious. It's probably not possible to edit it out of the title, so perhaps it was always
inevitable that the film would be at least 15 rated in the UK. And indeed that is the case, the BBFC have passed Suicide Squad as 15 uncut for sustained threat, moderate violence for 2016 cinema release in 2D and 3D versions. The US MPAA
had previously rated the film PG-13 for s equences of violence and action throughout, disturbing behavior, suggestive content and language. And the world censors seem to have mostly sided with the American film censor. Australia (M=PG-15),
Netherlands (12), Norway (12) , Singapore (PG-13) and Ireland (15A) all being lower than the UK. Russia opted for a higher 16 rating though. |
|
|
|
|
 | 19th July 2016
|
|
|
What It's Like Watching Porn and Rating Movies For the Ontario's Government See article from vice.com
|
|
|
|
|
 | 19th July 2016
|
|
|
Report from legal case against the MPAA by anti smoking campaigners who claim that showing smoking in PG-13 ratings is somehow responsible for people taking it up See
article from hollywoodreporter.com |
|
Distributors withdraw the movie Bastille Day from French cinemas
|
|
|
 | 18th July
2016
|
|
| Thanks to Nick See article from
bbc.co.uk |
The new movie Bastille Day , has been pulled from cinemas in France in the wake of the terrorist attack in Nice. The film involves a terrorist plot to bomb Paris. StudioCanal pulled adverts for Bastille Day a day after the attack and have now
asked cinemas to stop showing it altogether, according to Variety. The film's release dates in the UK and Germany were previously delayed in the aftermath of the Paris attacks . |
|
Are there any censorship/political influence issues with Chinese company taking over Odeon Cinemas?
|
|
|
 | 17th July 2016
|
|
| See article from asia.nikkei.com
|
Chinese real estate giant Dalian Wanda Group will purchase Europe's largest movie theater operator, expanding its already vast cinema network in China and the U.S. American unit AMC Entertainment Holdings, the second largest movie theater operator in
the U.S, said it will acquire Odeon & UCI Cinemas Group of the U.K. for £921 million. Wanda's cinema network is already the biggest in the world, with more than 7,500 screens. The group is also extending its reach in film production. This year, it
acquired U.S. studio Legendary Entertainment, which produces popular titles like the Godzilla movies. Wanda Chairman Wang Jianlin has openly declared his ambition to break the dominance of the six major global film studios including Walt Disney and to
make his company the king of movies. There have been concerns about censorship or promotional opportunities now available to China. It was noted for example that Transformers: Age of Extinction, released in 2014 by Paramount Pictures
received significant advertising income from product placement of Chinese products. Nikkei.com comments about the possibilities for political influence: Wanda likely will be able to wield heavier influence on film
production and distribution with its expanded cinema network. But if it tries to censor anti-Chinese content or promote overly pro-China content, audiences in mature, advanced economies would not tolerate that, says Kent Wertime of advertising agency
Ogilvy & Mather. Scripts for movies are sometimes altered to reflect Chinese interests. But if movies are exploited as a political tool, that would obviously drive away consumers in Europe and the U.S. Should that happen, Wanda's
massive spending on acquisitions would be in vain. As Wanda's involvement in movie businesses deepens, the group has to manage its operations with Western values in mind.
|
|
|
|
|
 | 17th July 2016
|
|
|
How Japanese censorship screwed up the international market for Hentai See article from animenewsnetwork.com |
|
Cinema group decides to not to release Ghostbusters in China due to the county's film censors banning the depiction of ghosts
|
|
|
 | 14th July 2016
|
|
| See article from hollywoodreporter.com |
China's film censorship rules ban the depiction of ghosts under the restrictions that movies must not promote cults or superstition. The rule is a euphemism for banning movies depicting, or promoting, religion, but nevertheless it is used to ban
anything more widely supernatural. Obviously Hollywood was considering the possibility of a Chinese release of Ghostbusters as it had generated publicity under a new local tile without the word 'ghost', Super Power Dare or Die Team. However the China Film Co., the dominant state-owned film body that handles the import and release of all foreign movies in the country, has decided not to release Ghostbusters.
An executive of the group covered for the Chinese censorship, with a propaganda statement claiming: Most of the Chinese audience didn't see the first and second movies, so they don't think there's much market
for it here.
Sony isn't commenting, but a Hollywood source with knowledge of the situation says the film hasn't been officially submitted for approval by Chinese film censors. |
|
French cinemas ban The Conjuring 2
|
|
|
 | 8th July 2016
|
|
| See article from flickreel.com |
The Conjuring 2 has proven to be a hit amongst audiences with an impressive box office return. However, it hasn't gone down too well in France, resulting in the film being banned from many theaters across the country. Le Parisien reports
that 262 French theatres had initially planned to show the sequel but the majority have now removed it from their listings due to loud laughter and hysterical yelling in screenings. Some Parisian theatres banned it on its release day
following disruptive conduct in screens and to ensure the safety of staff and customers. 400 UGC cinemas also didn't show the film, following anti-social behaviour. Marc-Olivier Sebbag, executive director of National Federation of French
Cinemas, said: Horror films attract a young audience who come in groups to have fun. Cinemas are aware of this and have learnt how to handle these situations. For The Conjuring 2, the problem is limited to some
showings in cinemas.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
4th July 2016
|
|
|
An interesting debate about the morality of animal cruelty censor cuts. By Dave Wain See article
from zombiehamster.com |
|
The Director of The Wicker Man finds his Summerisle
|
|
|
 | 3rd July 2016
|
|
| See article from bbc.com |
Film director Robin Hardy has died at the age of 86, a family friend has confirmed. He was best known for cult British film The Wicker Man . Edward Woodward was perfect as the dour and uptight policeman taken for a ride by Christopher Lee
and the colourful folks of Summerisle. Hardy, who went on to make follow-up The Wicker Tree in 2011, died on Friday. The Wicker Man was Hardy's feature debut, and he went on to direct only two more feature-length films. The second, The
Fantasist , came 13 years after his debut. In 2010, the Guardian named The Wicker Man the fourth-best horror film of all time. |
|
As judged by the amount of wound up whingers complaining to the BBFC
|
|
|
 | 1st July 2016
|
|
| Thanks to Nick See BBFC Annual Report 2015 [pdf]
from bbfc.co.uk |
There's not a lot in the BBFC Annual report covering 2015 that has mass appeal to newspaper readers so the last of films with the most complaints is the pick of the crop. Perhaps most notably all but one of the complained about films are those
that were cut for a lower category. As the cuts were suggested by the BBFC, then by definition, all these films sit exactly on category boundaries. And of course, set themselves up for the inevitable 'handful' of complaints. Spectre was top
with 40 complaints. The BBFC commented: Complaints about Spectre focussed on scenes of violence. During postproduction, the distributor sought advice on whether it could secure a 12A classification and if so, how. One
scene involving an eye-gouging was slightly too strong for the company's preferred 12A classification. We therefore suggested reductions to this scene. What remains in the classified version of the scene is a brief implication of what is happening, with
only limited visual detail. There is also a torture scene. Although the idea is unpleasant there is limited detail depicted. Given the lack of detail in the scene and the context of an action film featuring a larger-than-life hero
character who always defeats his enemies, this moderate violence is acceptable at 12A. Another scene, showing the bloody aftermath of a suicide, was similarly reduced.
Kingsman: The Secret Service was next best with 38
complaints: One of the issues raised by the public with regards to Kingsman: The Secret Service was the level of violence at 15, particularly in regards to a fight scene in a church. The BBFC
saw a version of the film before it was complete and offered advice as to how the film distributor's desired 15 rating could be achieved. Otherwise, the film would have been classified 18. The distributor chose to make changes before formally submitting
the film for classification. While there are some strong moments of violence in the film, they are relatively brief and do not dwell on the infliction of pain or injury to the extent they require an 18 classification. The BBFC therefore classified
the film 15. Other complaints focussed on a scene involving a crude sex reference which is unexpected but intended to be funny. In part thanks to the comic context, this line did not require the entire film be restricted to an
adult audience only by way of an 18 classification. [The BBFC are being a bit coy here, but presumably are referring to the Swedish princess offering anal sex as a reward for her rescue].
Absolutely Anything offended 22 for
it's 6 'fucks' in a 12 rated film: Absolutely Anything attracted complaints because of strong language and sex references. The distributor reduced the frequency of strong language in the film following advice prior to
the film's submission to the BBFC for formal classification. The film originally contained over 20 uses of strong language. The 12A version of the film contains six uses of strong language (f**k) and some moderate and mild bad
language. The language in Absolutely Anything was therefore within the Guidelines at 12A. Nevertheless, 22 members of the public complained about the number of uses of the F word as well as some references to sex.
The Maze
Runner: The Scorch Trials received 21 complaints: There were 21 complaints about violence and threat in The Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials. Scenes include gangs of people operating in a lawless environment, and
infected zombie-like people attacking other characters. The distributor sought advice on how to secure the classification it was aiming to achieve. The BBFC advised that the film was likely to receive a 15 certificate but a 12A
classification could be achieved by making some changes, including reducing moments of threat and horror involving zombie-like characters, and reducing the focus on injury in a scene in which a man is beaten for information. When the film was formally
submitted for classification, these changes had been made and, consequently, the film is within the Guidelines at 12A where moderate physical and psychological threat is permitted, as long as horror sequences are not too frequent or sustained and the
overall tone is not disturbing.
Whilst Minions , the only film on the list not cut, received 16 complaints: Minions received 16 complaints, mainly focussing on a scene set in a medieval-style
torture dungeon. The Minions are stretched on a rack, where it is apparent that they do not come to any harm, and this develops into them slipping unharmed through a noose and playing with the gallows. The scene takes place in an unrealistic, comic and
slapstick manner which is likely to be familiar to young viewers, who expect the Minions to survive. The realistic risk of harmful imitation is very low indeed. Some of the Minions complaints concerned a chase scene involving a
pale-faced man holding a chainsaw, and a clown juggling bombs. At U, scary or potentially unsettling sequences should be mild, brief and unlikely to cause undue anxiety to young children. The outcome should be reassuring. The fantastical and animated
context significantly distances the scenes from real life. Within the wider context, Minions is a well-known franchise which plays off the idea of villains , so images of villainous characters are to be expected. Furthermore, the Minions remain
unfazed and unthreatened. They instead appear to have lots of fun working together, adding to the comic tone which runs throughout. After careful consideration the BBFC classified the film at U.
|
|
|