| 18th May |
|
|
| Egyptian police arrest owner of satellite belly dancing channel Permalink
|
See article
from kansascity.com
|
Egypt's
vice police have arrested the owner of a belly dancing TV
station on on grounds of supposedly inciting licentiousness and
facilitating prostitution.
The station, ElTet, broadcasts videos 24 hours a day of
scantily clad belly dancers giving sultry performances.
Available on satellite TV, the station has gained a following,
in part because it shows an Egyptian art form that has grown
increasingly inaccessible for many people in the country, having
been largely relegated to expensive clubs and hotels as a
consequence of increasing religious extremism.
The police raided an apartment where the station's owner,
Baligh Hamdy, had been running the operations and recording most
of the videos, a police official said. apes and video equipment
was seized in the raid.
The official said Hamdy would record the videos and send them
over the Internet to his partners in Bahrain and Jordan, who
would in turn broadcast them on the station's satellite TV,
making it accessible in Egypt and elsewhere.
The raid was prompted by nutter complaints. The station also
carries advertisements for sexual enhancement products and
matchmaking messages. Theses ads seem to have triggered the
complaints.
|
| 24th April |
|
|
Babe channel Get Lucky TV takes its turn for a smacking from the TV censors at Ofcom Permalink full story: Babe Channels...Ofcom have it in for free to air babe channels
|
See article [pdf]
from stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk
|
Dirty
Wives
Get Lucky TV (Channel 909), 15 February 2012, 21:01 to 21:30
Dirty Wives is a segment of interactive
adult chat advertising content broadcast on the licensed service
known as Get Lucky TV (Sky Channel 909). The service is freely
available without mandatory restricted access and is situated in
the „adult section of the Sky electronic programme guide.
Viewers are invited to contact onscreen presenters via premium
rate telephony services. The female presenters dress and behave
in a sexually provocative way while encouraging viewers to
contact the premium phone numbers. The licence for Get Lucky TV
is owned and operated by Grandiose Limited.
Ofcom received a complaint that some content
broadcast immediately after the watershed contained sexual
images that were too strong to be shown at this time.
Ofcom noted there were three female
presenters on screen during the broadcast. The female presenter
on the left of the screen was wearing a pink leopard print top,
a black high leg thong, black stockings and shoes. From 21:04
this presenter adopted various positions. She knelt facing the
camera with her legs open and mimed sexual intercourse and knelt
with her bare buttocks to camera at times lifting up a leg to
reveal her crotch area in greater detail. On one occasion while
in this position, she pulled tightly on her thong and lifted it
to reveal anal detail.
Ofcom considered Rule 32.3, which states:
Relevant timing restrictions must be
applied to advertisements that, through their content, might
harm or distress children of particular ages or that are
otherwise unsuitable for them.
Ofcom Decision: Breach of Rule 32.3
Ofcom noted that between 21:01 and 21:30,
the female presenter on the left of the screen wore a high leg
thong that revealed her outer genital area. In addition, at
approximately 21:07 she was on all fours, with her bare buttocks
to camera and briefly pulled tightly on her thong on three
occasions to reveal her anal area. While wearing this very
skimpy clothing, she adopted sexual positions such as lying on
her back with her legs open to camera thrusting forward with her
hips, and kneeling facing the camera miming sexual intercourse.
The same presenter later but before 21:30: rubbed oil onto her
outer genital area and breasts (through her top); slapped her
buttocks; massaged her breasts and stroked her outer genital
area; and while kneeling with her buttocks side on to camera,
pulled her thong down to under her buttocks and gyrated her
hips. In Ofcom's view, the revealing clothing and sexual
positions and other inappropriate images, including that of anal
detail, were intended to be sexually provocative in nature. In
light of this behaviour and imagery, Ofcom concluded that this
material was clearly unsuitable for children.
The broadcast of such sexualised content was
inappropriate to advertise „adult sex chat so soon after the
21:00 watershed.
This broadcast was therefore in breach of
BCAP Code Rule 32.3.
|
| 17th April |
|
|
Dorcel growing in the market for high tech porn Permalink
|
See article
from newswire.xbiz.com
|
French
adult producer Marc Dorcel has reported strong company growth of
10% in 2011 along with net sales exceeding $33 million. The
company said its sales have doubled since 2007.
In 2010 Dorcel the company premiered its extensive 3D
catalogue with 200 exclusive programs especially designed for 3D
and produced with state-of-the-art recording technologies (3D
cameras, side by side, full HD). It also launched 3D IPTV and
SVOD platforms.
In 2011, the company also unveiled the Dorcel App for Smart
TV especially developed and designed for TV manufacturers. The
app allows viewers to access Dorcel content from their TV
screens.
The company has also diversified with European adult concept
stores dedicated to pleasure. The 4th Dorcel Store in
France opened its doors in March, 2011. Designed for couples,
the stores offer more than 3,000 adult products.
Plans are on tap to open 50 more stores in coming years and
bolster its line of classy Marc Dorcel sex toys.
Dorcel also ventured into publishing in 2008 with the monthly
Dorcel Mag that's distributed in France with a circulation of
30,000 issues.
With our magazine, our high quality TV channel, our chain
of sexy concept stores, our collection of stylish sextoys and
our soft production unit, we have settled our company in all
different sectors of the adult industry, making it a major
player of the sector and a global media group, CEO Gregory
Dorcel said.
|
| 27tht March |
|
|
PermalinkMurdoch firm said to have used hacker site to target pay-TV rival by releasing decryption keys enabling extensive piracy |
See article
from bbc.co.uk
|
|
|
| 21st March |
|
|
| Widespread offence of 1 person winds up the easily offended TV censors Permalink full story: Babe Channels...Ofcom have it in for free to air babe channels
|
See article [pdf]
from stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk
|
Storm
Night
Storm, 9 December 2011, 23:30
Storm is a free to air babe channel (Sky channel number 966).
The licence for the service is held by Chat Central.
A complainant alerted Ofcom to the broadcast of inappropriate
content during Storm Night on 9 December 2011.
The female presenter was wearing: a grey pleated skirt,
pulled up over her stomach and under her bare breasts; a
striped tie draped over her shoulders; a novelty necklace;
and white trainers and socks. The presenter was not wearing
any underwear.
During the broadcast she lay back on a desk, facing the
camera with her legs tightly closed. At various points
during the broadcast she changed position and covered her
genital area with either a flat or cupped hand.
Approximately 20 minutes into the broadcast she opened
her legs to camera and placed a cupped hand over her
genitals, clearly applying pressure against her genital
area.
She also poured white lotion onto her breasts, which
remained there for the duration of the broadcast.
Ofcom considered rule 4.2 of the BCAP Code:
Advertisements must not cause serious or widespread
offence against generally accepted moral, social or cultural
standards.
Ofcom has previously published rules on what Ofcom considers
to be acceptable to broadcast on these services post-watershed.
adult chat broadcasters should at no time:
- broadcast anal, labial or genital areas or broadcast
images of presenters touching their genital or anal
areas either with their hand or an object; and
- at no time broadcast shots of presenters using
liquids of a sort in a way which suggests the liquid is
ejaculate.
Ofcom Decision Breach of rule 4.2
In Ofcom's view the images highlighted above were strong and
clearly capable of causing offence. We noted that the broadcast
included material that is clearly inconsistent with Ofcom's
guidance. For example: the presenter was clearly applying
pressure against her genital area with her hand and used body
lotion in a way that suggested it was ejaculate.
Ofcom noted that in conjunction with those images the
presenter performed various other actions including: stroking
her body; shaking her breasts to camera; and miming fellatio.
Her position on screen (reclining on the desk facing the camera)
also resulted in her genital area becoming the focal point of
the shot, despite the fact there were no actual images of her
genitals, intrusive or otherwise. Ofcom considered the material
included images that are not permitted in „adult chat
advertising content that is available without mandatory
restricted access.
Ofcom considered that because the presenter was not wearing
any underwear, the chances of the material contravening the
relevant rules and guidance was significantly increased because
she had to ensure her genital area was adequately covered by her
hand each time she changed position.
Ofcom does not prohibit nudity in adult sex chat services.
However, as set out in Ofcom's guidance, images of presenters
touching their genital or anal areas either with their hand or
an object are prohibited within the context of „adult chat
advertising content that is freely available without mandatory
restricted access. In light of this we would caution against the
use of naked presenters when broadcasting this content.
Ofcom found this material in breach of Rule 4.2 of the BCAP
Code.
|
| 10th March |
|
|
South Africa's TV censor unilaterally decides that freedom of expression rates below women's rights to whinge at porn Permalink full story: Satellite Sex in Africa...MultiChoice consider adding porn channel
|
See article
from xbiz.com
|
South
Afica's TopTV's bid to air TV porn channels was banned in part
by the country's TV censor because it deemed women's rights and
dignity outweighed the right to freedom of expression.The
Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA)
released the reasons for its ban:
On the issue of balancing the rights of
women to equality and human dignity with the right of
freedom of expression, ICASA is of the view that the right
of women to equality and human dignity overrides TopTV's
right to freedom of expression, as well as the rights of
viewers to receive pornography on television in the home.
ICASA holds this view because it regards
the consumption of pornography as one contributing factor,
amongst others, to the normalization of violence against
women in SA.
In its statement ICASA summarised:
- The right of women to equality and human dignity
overrides TopTV's right to freedom of expression, as well as
the rights of viewers to receive pornography on television
in the home.
- TopTV's failure to take ICASA's public consultation
process seriously damaged its application.
- ICASA sees no reason to expand access to pornography
given government's restrictions on the content through the
Film and Publications Act.
Satellite pay-TV broadcaster TopTV is now seeking legal
advice before deciding on their next move.
|
| 8th March |
|
|
| Ofcom whinges about Dutch licensed Babestation that can be a little more sexy than repressed UK competitors Permalink full story: Babe Channels...Ofcom have it in for free to air babe channels
|
See article
from guardian.co.uk
|
UK
TV censor Ofcom has complained to the Dutch media regulator
about the content of adult chat channels Babestation and Smile
TV, which are licensed in the Netherlands but broadcast to
millions of Freeview households in the UK .
The UK TV cenosr said that this is an important issue, and
active discussions are under way with Commissariaat voor de
Media (Dutch media authority), the country's content licensing
body, to see how British audiences can be protected from scenes
of near naked women massaging each other's breasts, masturbating
and faking orgasms.
Babestation and Smile TV broadcast free to air on digital
terrestrial TV service Freeview between 10pm and 6am.
Ofcom has previously revoked the broadcast licences of UK
adult TV channels that are anywhere near sexy. However, as
Babestation and Smile TV are licensed by the Dutch media
authority, rather than Ofcom, the UK regulator has no power to
block or ban them.
The TV censor added that it has no tally of the number of
complaints received from British viewers about the channels,
adding that it advises those offended to approach the Dutch
regulator.
Caroline Dinenage, Conservative MP for Gosport and member of
the parliamentary inquiry into online child protection, said
there was an urgent need to address inappropriate television
content:
Some of the images on Freeview may be
contravening UK regulation. This is terrestrial TV, free to
everyone, including children and teenagers.
We need to ensure that Freeview
operators who sell capacity to non-UK porn channels behave
responsibly, and respect UK regulations. There may be a
compelling case for Ofcom to withdraw licences from
companies selling spectrum to porn channels, without putting
in place age restrictive access control.
The channels could be in breach of puritanical UK censorship
rules by promoting websites offering R18 hardcore
pornography content or equivalent.
An Ofcom spokesprude said If they don't do what we ask
them we can go to the European Commission.
A Freeview spokesperson said as an open platform it is
required to broadcast licensed channels that apply for
distribution, including Babestation and Smile TV. The channels
use DTT spectrum owned by Arqiva to broadcast on Freeview. Each
multiplex owner is responsible for a bundle of spectrum via
which a number of channels are broadcast. Any spectrum not used
for their own channels is leased to other broadcasters.
A spokesman for Dmol, a company owned by the operators of the
six Freeview multiplexes -- the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Arqiva
said that the current arrangement was not ideal, with the
Dutch-licensed adult chat channels accessible to 90% of about
10.6m UK homes that use Freeview:
We are conscious of the need to move
quickly. We are encouraged by news of Ofcom's active
discussions.
|
| 6th March |
|
|
| Ofcom resumes its tirade against babe channels Permalink full story: Babe Channels...Ofcom have it in for free to air babe channels
|
See complaints
bulletin [pdf]
from stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk
|
ChatGirl
TV
Adult Channel (Channel 901), 4 November 2011, 21:00 to 21:30
ChatGirl TV is a babe channel operating when the Adult
channel isn't. The content is supplied by a third party but
Playboy TV is responsible for the compliance of the service.
Ofcom received a complaint that the sexual content detailed
below was too strong immediately after the watershed.
The female presenter was wearing a one
piece black and white patterned outfit. This consisted of
two thin strips of fabric covering her nipples only joined
by strings to a thin strip of fabric which covered her inner
genital area only. Over the top of this outfit she wore
leather-look hot pants which had a zip at the front which
she pulled down at approximately 21:02 to reveal her pubic
area and inside the thin fabric covering her inner genital
area.
From 21:00 the presenter adopted various
positions. She lay on her side gently thrusting her hips
forward and at times lifted up a leg to reveal her crotch
area in greater detail. In this position, she pulled tightly
on the strings connecting the strip of fabric covering her
inner genital area to emphasise her pubic area and she
repeatedly stroked her legs and inner thighs. The camera
regularly zoomed into the presenter's crotch in an intrusive
and prolonged manner during the broadcast.
The presenter also lay on her front and
pulled down her hot pants to under her buttocks and thrust
her bottom upwards. The images of the bare buttocks, shot to
the side to avoid genital detail, were at times close up and
prolonged.
Ofcom considered Rule 32.3, which states:
Relevant timing restrictions must be
applied to advertisements that, through their content, might
harm or distress children of particular ages or that are
otherwise unsuitable for them.
Playboy TV viewed the material and confirmed that it did
not conform to the guidelines on adult PRS services1 .
The content supplier, Access All Media, also wrote to Ofcom
and conceded that on some occasions her [the presenter's]
movements, together with the camera-work, have resulted in
content which appears stronger than intended due to the skimpy
nature of her outfit. It further accepted that the
close-ups were unfortunate given the presenter's outfit. We can
now see how the combination of the close-ups and the presenter's
outfit served to increase the strength of the content beyond the
intended threshold, for which we sincerely apologise.
Ofcom Decision: Breach of BCAP Code Rule 32.3
In Ofcom's view, the revealing clothing, sexual positions and
close up intrusive images were intended to be sexually
provocative in nature. In light of this behaviour and imagery,
Ofcom concluded that this material was clearly unsuitable for
children.
In Ofcom's opinion, viewers (and in particular parents) would
not expect such material to be broadcast and available to view
so soon after 21:00, particularly given that material broadcast
on such services prior to 21:00 should be non-sexual in tone and
apparent intent. The broadcast of such sexualised content was
inappropriate to advertise „adult sex? chat so soon after the
21:00 watershed. This broadcast was therefore in breach of BCAP
Code Rule 32.3.
This present contravention of the BCAP Code is another
example of poor compliance by the Licensee, given the strength
of the material broadcast immediately following the watershed.
However, Ofcom notes that the Licensee states it has taken
several measures to improve its compliance since 15 November
2011. We would therefore anticipate no further similar breaches
of the BCAP Code. Also the Licensee admitted promptly and fully
that this content did not comply with the Chat Service Guidance.
Playboy TV remains on notice however that any further similar
contraventions of the BCAP Code will be considered for further
regulatory action by Ofcom.
Breach of BCAP Code Rule 32.3
|
| 22nd February |
|
|
Permalink full story: Satellite Sex in Africa...MultiChoice consider adding porn channelThe Independent Communications Authority of SA (Icasa) has no right under the country's constitution to block pay-TV operator TopTV from launching adult channels. |
See article
from techcentral.co.za
|
|
|
| 28th January |
|
|
| TopTV wants to go ahead with its porn channels without waiting for the heel dragging TV censors to give approval Permalink full story: Satellite Sex in Africa...MultiChoice consider adding porn channel
|
10th January 2012. See article
from businessday.co.za
See also
Trade union federation has a whinge
from iol.co.za
See also
TopTV says porn is ‘harmless’ from witness.co.za
|
South
Africa's Independent Communications Authority will take legal action against
TopTV should the pay-TV broadcaster continue with its plan to launch three porn
television channels within the next few weeks.
On Digital Media, the company that owns TopTV, said last
month it would go ahead with the launch of the channels early
this month despite Icasa's objections.
It argued that the TV censor had not responded to its
application in the required three months and TopTV was therefore
legally entitled to go ahead.
However, Icasa last week maintained that it was illegal for
TopTV to proceed with the launch until the regulator had
finalised the application process.
If TopTV goes ahead with the launch we will have no option
but to obtain an interdict to stop them. We are waiting for
their response to our queries, Icasa spokesman Paseka Maleka
said. He added a public hearing on the issue would be held
within the next two weeks. Icasa would rule on whether or not it
would grant TopTV's application for the three new channels by
the end of the month.
Update: Court prevents porn starting before
the TV censor has finished deliberating
17th January 2012. See article
from mybroadband.co.za
The South Gauteng High Court has granted the
Independent Communications Authority of South Africa an urgent
interdict to stop a satellite TV operator rom going ahead with
its proposed porn channels. The company must now wait on the
deliberation by the TV censor.
TopTV wants to introduce a standalone porn package of
channels Adult XXX, Private Spice and Playboy Europe.
The TV censor's public hearings into the licence application
by On-Digital Media, owner of Top TV, have now begun in Sandton,
Johannesburg, where the year-old operator was not represented
despite being invited to respond and make presentations.
The misleadingly named Freedom of Expression Institute,
African Christian Democratic Party and the Film and Publication
Board have all opposed the launch.
Freedom of expression is not a pre-eminent right, and
especially not when it infringes on children's rights to be
protected from harm, spouted Pearl Kupe, on behalf of the
Christian Action Network: Putting in pin-blocking functions
presents very little challenge to the increasingly techno-savvy
generation, and I know this being a mother.
The African Christian Democratic Party said it was impossible
to build a strong nation with dysfunctional families, and
producers and distributors of pornography had shown contempt
for family values.
Freedom of Expression Institute's executive director, Elston
Seppie, said the right to freedom of expression was about
balance, ...BUT...the right of children, women and
family values should take precedence.
Update: Inevitably Banned
28th January 2012. See article
from xbiz.com
TopTV has lost its bid to provide South Africa with its
first-ever paid adult satellite programming.
South Africa's TV censor, the Independent Communications
Authority of South Africa (ICASA) has refused to allow the
company to broadcast softcore Playboy Europe, and
hardcore Private Spice and Adult XXX channels.
ICASA spokesperson, Paseka Maleka said the censor would
release the reasons for the denial wihtin the next 30 days.
In a letter to Reuters, ICASA said, We advise that the
Council of the Authority ... decided, after careful
consideration, to refuse On Digital Media (Pty) Ltd's
application for the authorization of (the proposed) video
channels.
Update: Inevitably Delayed
2nd March 2012. See article
from mybroadband.co.za
ICASA said it would provide grounds for its decision within
30 days, or by 27 February 2012.
However the TV censor did not deliver its justification by
the deadline, telling MyBroadband that the reasons are yet to be
approved by ICASA Council in the next week or so.
They are currently being vetted by ICASA Legal Department
and will therefore be released after approval by Council,
explained ICASA spokesperson Paseka Maleka.
|
| 16th January |
|
|
| Dolly Buster satellite TV service closes Permalink
|
|
|
The
European hardcore satellite service, Dolly Buster TV has ended.
The company behind the service has now ceased trading.
Dolly Buster TV previously offered 5 hardcore channels broadcasting from the
Hotbird Satellite.
|
| 11th January |
|
|
| Television X to broadcast a one-off Angel Long special in Soft 3D Permalink
|
See article
from news.avn.com
|
The
softcore UK adult TV station, Television X, is about to make British
broadcasting history by being the first to broadcast in 3D.
The Society 3D will be broadcast on 13th and 14th of January on
Television X and its sister channel Red Hot TV to subscribing Sky customers with
a 3D TV.
Those who have a 3D TV can watch the interlaced side-by-side
version which uses state of the art technology to create the 3D
images.
In this one-off 3D special, Television X follows a submissive
Angel Long as she is initiated into the sex-mad world of The
Society. The landmark film has been produced by Kaizen XXX,
which employed many techniques in order to make the 3D effects
really impressive.
For the opening image, which shows Angel blowing smoke
rings into the viewers face, to the final, closing 'pop' shot, I
aimed to make this film an iconic piece of porn history,
said Andy P from the production house.
We are really excited about bringing an intensely erotic
experience to our customers across the UK and Ireland, said
Head of Programming for Television X Chris Ratcliff: The UK
has never seen anything like this!
And for once, being totally softcore may be an advantage.
Viewers won't have to be worried about being poked in the eye by
a long hard dick.
|
|
|