|
|
Canadian parliament passes motion to study the public health effects of porn
|
|
|
|
17th November 2016
|
|
|
See article from lifesitenews.com
|
The Canadian Parliament has unanimously agreed a motion calling on the Commons Standing Committee on Health to examine the public health effects of the ease of access and viewing of online violent and degrading sexually explicit material on children,
women and men. Kamal Khera, the parliamentary secretary to the minister of health, announced the government's full support for the motion. Northern Alberta MP Arnold Viersen, the driving force behind the motion told the religious website,
LifeSiteNews, loath to raise the issue of internet censorship and that oncentrating on the health implications was a good way to ensure all-party support and also to stress public education rather than legal restrictions. Ultimately, he wants the same
kind of widespread condemnation of pornography that has already occurred with smoking. Rather than offering any evidence of harm, he is rather hoping for something to crop up in the future. He said: Gradually the
scientific evidence became known about smoking's impact on the heart and the lungs. Now that kind of information about the health impact of pornography on the user is also being discovered.
When pornography's harms become thoroughly
exposed, he hopes that Internet providers will restrict porn use voluntarily. In Canada, sexually explicit websites get more visitors each month than Netflix, Amazon, and Twitter combined, with PornHub, the largest free site, alone receiving over
21 billion visits in 2015. Thirty-five percent of all Internet downloads are sexually explicit. Globally, this sexually explicit material is a $97 billion industry. With all that porn being used and so little evidence of tangible harm, one wonders
what the MPs are hoping to discover. Perhaps they should examine the public health effects of the ease of access and viewing of online violent religious material on children, women and men. The murder and violence caused by religion is far more
widespread and apparent than any moralistic hopes that there may be a few moral downsides to porn.
|
|
|
Tech conference moved to London after being banned in Malaysia
|
|
|
|
22nd October 2016
|
|
|
See article from sputniknews.com See also
loveandsexwithrobots.org
|
Scientists and robotics experts will gather in London to discuss how humans will incorporate artificial intelligence into their sex lives. Banned in Malaysia, the 2nd International Congress on Love and Sex with Robots will be hosted by
Goldsmiths University, and will gather top scientists in the fields of robotics and human-computer interaction. Dr. Kate Devlin, event host, told the Daily Mirror: I think robots could become our lovers in the
future. Does love have to be reciprocated in order to be valid? Our research aims to carve a new narrative, moving away from sex robots purely defined as machines used as sex objects, as substitutes for human partners, made by
men, for men, she said. A machine is a blank slate -- it is what we make of it. Why should a sex robot be binary? What about the potential for therapy? It's time for new approaches to artificial sexuality.
Open to the public, the
conference will be held December 19-20.
|
|
|
Westminster Council to consult with the public to decide how to punish a lap dancing club that offered too much fun
|
|
|
|
15th October 2016
|
|
|
See article from mirror.co.uk
|
A flagship London West End lap dancing club is in trouble with the local council for offering a little too much fun. Platinum Lace at Trocadero just off Leicester Square boasts on its website of entertaining the likes of Pixie Lott, Professor Green,
Snoop Dogg, David Haye and a host of Premier League footballers. It hit the headlines earlier this year after a video emerged of two of its dancers encouraging customers to fondle them. And this week, the miserable bosses at Westminster City
Council have announced a course of action. The Council will put questions about their enforcement action in a public consultation and have now confirmed the venue had its licence temporarily extended ahead of the results of the
consultation. When the public have had their say, the council's licensing committee will re-visit the application and decided whether consultation to close the club down or not. An undercover investigation into practices at the club revealed a
number of the dancers openly breaking the council regulations, including two dancers called Mindy and Carla , who were covertly filmed allowing customers to grope them in VIP booths. Further footage, shot in December, shows a blonde dancer
called Mindy also placing a customer's hands all over her body at the London venue. A team of officers from Westminster City Council reviewed video evidence and spoke with club bosses after the evidence surfaced earlier this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd April 2016
|
|
|
Sex and Censorship responds to the government consultation on the censorship of internet porn See article from
sexandcensorship.org
|
|
|
Nick Clegg calls for poppers to remain legal whilst reviewing their ban under the Psychoactive Substances Act
|
|
|
|
11th March 2016
|
|
|
See article from theguardian.com
|
The UK's poppers manufacturers should be allowed to operate while the government reviews the product's legality, the former deputy prime minister Nick Clegg has said: Poppers have been around for decades,The evidence shows
they don't pose any great risk to health, and that's why they have never been banned before. Frankly they could have been made exempt from the new act without the need for a review, but the government didn't want to admit they had
got it wrong. While there is a review ongoing, of course the legitimate businesses that produce poppers should be allowed to continue to operate.
The government's psychoactive substances bill will come into force on 6 April, making
poppers illegal in the UK. In response to calls to exempt the product from the bill in January, the government announced a review of the ban, which is expected to report before the summer recess in July, leaving a window of around three months in which
UK poppers manufacturers risk going bust. Poppers is the name given to the chemicals alkyl nitrites, which, when sniffed, give the user a short, sharp head rush. The substance was first circulated as an angina medicine before emerging as a party
drug on the gay scene in the 1970s. Poppers are particularly, though not exclusively, used by gay and bisexual men to enhance sexual pleasure, as they relax the muscles and make it easier to have anal sex. They are sold for about £5 a bottle in
most sex shops and some cornershops and are available for anybody over the age of 16 to buy. Offsite Article: The poppers ban...Will it criminalise gay users? 8th March 2016. See
article from theguardian.com
Offsite Article: The poppers ban is a veiled attack on
pleasure 23rd March 2016. See article from theguardian.com by David Nutt
|
|
|