We
the undersigned request that the Customs Minister Mr Brendan O'Connor repeal the
CEO Instrument of Approval that included the word pornography on all
incoming passenger cards.
Sign the
petition
Background Information
The Australian Sex Party is demanding the new question that has
appeared on Incoming Passenger Cards at the Customs point of entry into
Australia be removed. The new question asks if they are carrying any
pornography.
Sex Party President, Fiona Patten, said that this development now
gave Government officials an unfettered right to examine someone's
laptop or mobile phone as they re-entered the country. A senior Customs
official, Richard Janeczko, has been quoted as saying that materials
stored on electronic media devices such as laptops, thumb drives and
iPhones are on their target list.
If you and your partner have filmed or photographed yourselves
making love in an exotic destination or even taking a bath, you will
have to answer 'Yes' to the question or you will be breaking the law,
she said. Travellers must now also declare perfectly legal materials
such as Category 1 and 2 Restricted magazines, X18+ films and quite
probably a large section of R18+ films which have explicit sex in them.
Ms Patten said the change marked the beginning of a new era of official
investigation into people's private lives – being investigated or
searched on the basis that you might have legal material in your
possession.
She said that by answering YES to the new Question One on the
declarations, people would then be asked whether they are declaring a
weapon, illicit drugs or pornography. When they answered pornography
their materials would then be examined by one and possibly a number of
Customs Officers. If people were at all embarrassed by the question,
often surrounded by family and friends, they could be taken into a
private room and even have their person searched. Is it fair that
Customs officers rummage through someone's luggage and pull out a legal
men's magazine or a lesbian journal in front of their children or their
mother-in-law, she said?
Customs' official reasoning behind the changes states that No
consultation was undertaken under section 17 of the Legislative
Instruments Act 2003 before this instrument was made as it is of a minor
or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing
arrangements.
The term 'pornography' is not referred to at all in the federal
Classification Act which Customs rely on to classify their material .
|