| |
SNP adopt a resolution to not use Scotland's archaic blasphemy law to prosecute anyone, there are plenty of modern equivalents to use instead
|
|
|
 | 30th March 2018
|
|
| See article from scottishlegal.com
|
The Scottish National Party has passed a resolution that Scotland's centuries-old blasphemy law should be abolished, or at least never be used to prosecute anyone. Blasphemy is outlawed under the Confession of Faith Ratification Act 1690 and was last
used in 1843 to convict the Edinburgh bookseller Thomas Paterson who was imprisoned for selling blasphemous literature. The motion said Scotland lags behind other European countries by still having the law on the statute books and called for the
abolition of the archaic common law crimes of blasphemy, heresy and profanity to the extent that they remain law in Scotland. |
| |
Informative YouTube history lesson about Hitler presented in a light, but neutral observational tone banned for UK viewers
|
|
|
 | 22nd March 2018
|
|
| See article from reddit.com See
Hitler OverSimplified Part 1 from YouTube See Hitler OverSimplified Part 2
from YouTube |
 | | UK
|
 | | outside UK |
OverSimplified is an informative factual series of short history lessons is an animated and light tone. However the commentary is unbiased, observational and neutral. No sane and rational human would consider these videos as tight wind
propaganda or the like. Yet Google has banned them from UK eyes with the message 'This content is not available on this country domain'. Google does not provide a reason fr the censorship but there are two likely candidates.
- Maybe Google's unintelligent AI systems cannot detect the difference between a history lesson about Hitler from a video inciting support for Hitler's ideas/
- Maybe someone flagged the video for unfair reasons and Google's commercial
expediency means its cheaper and easier to uphold the ban rather than get a moderator to spend a few minutes watching it.
Either way the cost of the censorship is that it will achieve nothing towards the censors were seeking, but it will alienate those that believe in free speech and democracy. |
| |
Scottish football fans win campaign to repeal law that criminalised football chants
|
|
|
 | 16th March
2018
|
|
| See article from commonspace.scot
|
Fans Against Criminalisation campaigner Paul Quigley is celebrating momentous victory for the group which has lobbied for the repeal of the disgraceful Offensive Behaviour at Football Act for the last seven years. The act was a knee jerk
reaction to Celtic vs Rangers game where Celtic manager Neil Lennon was attacked on field and letter bombs were later sent to Lennon, Paul McBride QC and Trish Godman MSP. The resulting legislation was nominally about tackling sectarianism but in
reality gave the police carte-blanche powers to arrest fans for whatever they wished under the catch-all guise of offensiveness. Paul Quigley explained: A decision was taken to form a campaign to fight this,
partly due to a deeply held collective ideological belief in the right to freedom of expression and equality before law, and partly due to the simple notion of self defence. Fans of all clubs would be welcome to join our
organisation and that we would help and campaign for all football fans who we deemed to be the subject of unjust treatment. Fans Against Criminalisation was able to count on the support of thousands of passionate supporters of the
campaign, as was evidenced by a demonstration at George Square which drew thousands of people in late 2011. In spite of this, the government seemed to assume that this would all die down in due course, and that the fan campaign would not have the
capability or endurance required to give them real cause to reconsider their position. The treatment that football fans have had to endure ever since has been appalling. The human cost of this legislation is often lost amid the
political rabble rousing, among the doctored statistics and the nauseatingly disingenuous moral grandstanding. The reality of the Offensive Behaviour at Football Act is this; it has ruined lives and caused serious damage in our communities.
In the face of all of this, football fans endured. In the years that followed, an incredible campaign challenged this treatment of supporters and lobbied for the repeal of this ill advised and illiberal piece of legislation. Today,
the Scottish Parliament finally voted on this very question. The Repeal Bill has passed, and this is the first time in the history of devolution that the Scottish Parliament has repealed its own legislation. This victory is
historic not just for football fans, but for the country.
As a follow up. James Dornan, the MSP for Glasgow Cathcart and a candidate for deputy leader of the Scottish National Party, has decided to quit Twitter. He describes it as a
cesspit of hate and bile, saying he has received abuse from football fans over his defence of the Offence Behaviour at Football Act (OBFA). His disgraceful 'defence' of the legislation was to try and suggest that the campaign was some sort Labour party
political effort. The fans were not impressed and clearly gave him the slagging off he deserved. See more on this in
article from spiked-online.com |
| |
Hooded thugs disrupt free speech event at Kings College London
|
|
|
 | 10th March 2018
|
|
| 6th March 2018. See
article from dailystar.co.uk See
more details from reason.com See Sargon of
Akkad from YouTube |
Hooded thugs have stormed a free speech event King's College London, throwing smoke bombs and attacking security guards. Believed to be part of the anti-facist movement, violent protesters forced their way into a lecture hall before setting off
smoke bombs and smashing windows. Thugs grabbed the speaker's microphone, while several security guards were punched during the melee. A threatening note was also left for the compere. Ten to 15 people dressed all in black, with black hoods
and black face masks, leapt over the barriers and instantly engaged in a fight with two or three security guards, said witness Tristan Teller: They tried to stop them but they just started punching them in the face.
One guard, a grey-haired gentleman who looked to be in around 60, received several punches.
The event, which was organised by KCL Libertarian Society, saw YouTube personality Sargon of Akkad, real name Carl Benjamin, invited to speak
alongside Ayn Rand Institute director Dr Yaron Brook. The group were had dispersed by the time police arrived. There have been no reported injuries. No arrests. Enquiries continue.
Update: Antifa: the militant wing of authoritarianism 10th March 2018. See article from spiked-online.com
by Fraser Myers The clash at King's College confirms anti-fascism now just means censorship.
|
| |
Humberside police launch a one sided prosecution of an innocent man who joked about gypsies, just so that they can virtue signal about how seriously they take hate crime
|
|
|
 | 29th January 2018
|
|
| See article from dailymail.co.uk
|
Joshua North, who was prosecuted by Humberside police with the help of counter-terror experts, has been cleared by a jury over his satirical Facebook post where he called for national batter gypos day. A costs order in North's favour will be made.
North had responded on Facebook after national news reported that travellers had caused trouble in Cleethorpes. North said he made the statement to mock other people's 'hateful comments'. North said the case had led to almost two years of hell for
him and his family and noted that there was no investigation into my side of the story. After he was cleared of inciting racial hatred Joshua North, from Cleethorpes, blasted the decision to prosecute him as
political correctness gone mad. He said: I told the police, if you check all my other Facebook posts, it indicates that I'm very friendly to immigrants, other races and religions.
The decision to
prosecute was criticised by North's lawyer who said the case had been brought with 'the full force of the resources of the counter-terrorism unit'. He said: I am disappointed that the prosecution, who had the full
force of the resources of the counter-terrorism unit behind them, did not at any point consider what kind of a person Joshua actually is. Had they spent any time thinking about him, looking at his other posts or even considering
the possibility of another interpretation other than that they fixed upon, it would have occurred to them that Joshua is the last person to incite racial hatred. Instead, they fixed on an interpretation and they refused to
consider any other possibility even after he had advanced his position in interview. What we have is a young, kind, decent, liberal, broad-minded man who works hard and who has been put through hell.
After the
case concluded, Humberside Police defended its decision to charge North, stating it takes hate crime allegations seriously.
|
|
|