|
|
Indian press notes that the BBFC demanded cuts for a 12A rating for Race 3 but, was uncut in India with the same certificate
|
|
|
|
30th June 2018
|
|
|
19th June 2018. From freepressjournal.in
|
Race 3 is a 2018 India action thriller by Remo D'Souza (as Remo). Starring Anil Kapoor, Salman Khan and Jacqueline Fernandez.
Revolves around a family that deals in borderline crime; ruthless and vindictive to the core.
The BBFC required 1:20s of cuts for a 12A rated cinema release. The BBFC noted that the cut
version contained moderate violence, sex references. The BBFC explained the cut saying: The company has chosen to remove scenes of strong violence in order to achieve a 12A classification. An uncut 15
classification was available
In India the censors have rated the film as U/A uncut. The U/A is equivalent to a 12A rating in that under 12s can only see the film if accompanied by a parent. The UK cuts have generated interest
in India with the perspective that it shows that Indian censors are not strict enough. Free Press Journal reports: A source from the Indian censor board finds the discrepancy between the Indian and British censor's
perception to be disconcerting. Are we to presume that the Indian censor board is more liberal than its British counterpart? To be honest we did have reservations about certain shots being suitable for a 'UA' certification. But
there is a standing instruction from above (meaning the I &B ministry) that nothing should be cut from any film unless absolutely necessary. We are looking at an era of unstoppable liberalism in the censor board. This is to
countermand the sanskari era of Pahlaj Nihalani .
Update: Another example of a higher rating from the BBFC than from the CBFC 30th June 2018. See
article from zeenews.india.com
Sanju is a 2018 India biography by Rajkumar Hirani. Starring Ranbir Kapoor, Paresh Rawal and Manisha Koirala.
Few lives in our times are as dramatic and enigmatic as the saga of Sanjay Dutt. Coming from a family of cinema legends, he himself became a film star, and then saw dizzying heights and darkest depths:
adulation of die-hard fans, unending battles with various addictions, brushes with the underworld, prison terms, loss of loved ones, and the haunting speculation that he might or might not be a terrorist. Sanju is in turns a hilarious and heartbreaking
exploration of one man's battle against his own wild self and the formidable external forces trying to crush him. UK: Passed 15 uncut for drug references, drug misuse, infrequent strong sex references for 2018 cinema release. India: Passed U/A (12A) after 1 cut to delete the sight of an overflowing toilet in a prison cell.
Rajkumar Hirani's Sanju which opened in cinemas on Friday. India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) cleared the film with a U/A certificate with just one cut asking the makers to remove the overflowing prison toilet scene
from the movie for aesthetic reasons. U/A is more a less a 12A rating in India and this has now been compared with the 15 BBFC 15 uncut rating for drug references, drug misuse, infrequent strong sex references. It is the second example this
month cited in the India press claiming that the India censors are more liberal than the BBFC. Comment: BBFC go high 13th September 2018. Thanks to Joseph Having seen both of the films
mentioned in cinemas; including the 12A version of Race 3 and later the uncut bits online. I can definitely agree with the BBFC's decision to request cuts for a 12A; the cuts mainly occur to a shootout near the start of the film where large blood
spurts are shown from shotgun blasts, and to some other violence later in the film. As for Sanju I'm kinda conflicted, it would've definitely been a borderline decision between the 12A/15 categories and ultimately they went
for a 15 (they usually go for the higher in borderline cases); while there is drug use it is entirely within the first act, in the context of actor Sanjay Dutt's drug addiction which is shown to have major negative effects and is strongly discouraged.
The film has a very strong anti drug message. The drug use is also mostly implied with the exception of some joint smoking and a pill being placed in a man's mouth; although drugs such as cocaine are implied. The film also feels like a 12A rather than a
15 tonally with the film being upbeat and inspirational in tone. However the level of drug taking and frequency of verbal references in the first act meant I can understand the 15.
|
|
|
Indian court dismisses petition that a magazine cover showing breastfeeding was somehow obscene
|
|
|
|
22nd June 2018
|
|
|
See article from globallegalpost.com
|
The Kerala High Court has refused to categorise the cover of the March issue of Grihalakshmi magazine showing a woman breastfeeding her baby as obscene, noting that shocking one's morals is an elusive concept, and that one man's vulgarity is another
man's lyric. The Bench observed: We do not see, despite our best efforts, obscenity in the picture, nor do we find anything objectionable in the caption, for men. We looked at the picture with the same eyes we look
at the paintings of artists like Raja Ravi Varma. As the beauty lies in the beholder's eye, so does obscenity, perhaps.
Petitioner Felix M.A. had contended that the magazine cover violated provisions of the Protection of Children from
Sexual Offences Act and Rules, as well as Section 45 of the Juvenile Justice Act. He had also alleged violation of provisions of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, and an Article of the Constitution of India.
|
|
|
Gay teen romance banned by India's film censors
|
|
|
|
10th June 2018
|
|
|
7th June 2018. See article from indy100.com
|
Love, Simon is a 2018 USA gay drama by Greg Berlanti. Starring Katherine Langford, Nick Robinson and Jennifer Garner.
From the producers of The Fault in Our Stars comes the relatable and heartfelt coming-of-age film LOVE, SIMON. Everyone deserves a great love story, but for 17-year-old Simon, it's a bit complicated. The gay
teenager hasn't come out yet, and doesn't know the identity of the anonymous classmate he's fallen for online. Resolving both issues will be a hilarious, scary, life-changing adventure. The film was banned by the film censors of
the Central Board of Film Certification on the day of its release. The CBFC has said little so far beyond noting that the film was banned for gay content. The film contains no explicit content although there is a kiss between the two lads. In the UK the cinema release was passed 12A uncut for
moderate sex references, infrequent strong language. In the US the film was rated PG-13 for thematic elements, sexual references, language and teen partying Update: Film censor says that the ban is not
down to him 10th June 2018. See article from deccanchronicle.com CBFC chairperson Prasoon Joshi has
completely denied that the CBFC has banned on Love, Simon. He said that an adults-only CBFC 'A' certificate has been given to Love, Simon four months ago, on February 6, 2018 after 2 cuts described as minor. Another source from the CBFC says, This is
one more attempt to use the censor board to gain publicity for a film. However it is has not been made clear an alternative reason for the film being pulled from cinema s at the last moment.
|
|
|
Indian sikhs form a film censor board and claim that films that feature the religion should get approval
|
|
|
|
24th May 2018
|
|
|
See article from telegraphindia.com
|
The Akal Takht, the highest seat of authority of Sikhism in India, has formed a 21-member film censor board and claimed that its clearance will have to be taken before making any movie on the Sikh religion and culture. Giani Gurbachan Singh, the Akal
Takht head claimed: The decision was taken because of controversies over films on Sikh gurus and distortion of Sikh history in movies. Any film that plans to portray any sequence related to Sikh gurus, their kin and
Sikh history will have to seek clearance from the Sikh Film Censor Board.
Over the past few years, the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee has been demanding that at least two of its members be included in the Central Board of
Film Certification (CBFC), India's official film censor. Unlike the CBFC, which comes into play after a film is complete and before its release, the Sikh board has said its approval will have to be taken for the script of any feature film,
documentary, animation and play based on the Sikh religion.
|
|
|
Deadpool 2 cut in India, but not as heavily as the original
|
|
|
|
16th May 2018
|
|
|
See article from
bollywoodlife.com
|
Deadpool 2 is following in the footsteps of the original Deadpool by suffering at the hands of film censors from the Central Board of Film Certification. Deadpool has had strong language beeped out or muted but
bollywoodlife.com reports
that the film has not suffered any visual cuts. After the language cuts have been implemented the film has been granted an adults only 'A' certificate. The movie is set to release in English, Hindi, Tamil and Telugu formats.
|
|
|
Indian state debates adding censorship warnings when a film depicts violence against women
|
|
|
|
28th April 2018
|
|
|
See article from thenewsminute.com
|
Cinema films in the Indian state of Kerala are soon set to display a statutory warning when showing scenes that depict violence against women. This comes after the Kerala State Human Rights Commission issued a directive to the regional office of
the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), asking the board to include a statutory warning that violence against women is punishable under the law, when showing scenes that portray crimes against the gender. The Commission claimed that showing
violent sexual crimes on screen could influence youngsters and hoped that displaying the statutory warning may create a positive impact. Regional officer of CBFC, A Prathibha, told TNM that the board is open to complying with the Commission's
directive. He said: We have informed the CBFC Chairman about the directive and hope to arrive at a decision within 30 days. Since we agree with the Commission's observation that a warning that such acts are punishable
must be displayed, I am certain the Chairman will issue a favourable order soon,
However, he added: We don't have a clear picture as to how to implement this.
|
|
|
According to a Citizen Lab survey
|
|
|
|
25th April 2018
|
|
|
See article from bgr.in
|
India topped a survey of countries having firewalls and censorship systems to block web pages. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) in the country have installed the highest number of censorshp systems, and have blocked the highest number of web pages. According to a new investigation covering 10 countries by University of Toronto-based Citizen Lab along with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) and The Indian Express found that India had 42 installations of technology marketed by Canadian company Netsweeper that implement content censorship for national-level, consumer-facing ISPs. These installations were found in internet services offered by 12 ISPs in the country. India also had the highest number of blocked unique URLs at 1,158 out of 2,464.
The data being released today accounts only for representative samples of censorship during the testing period between August 2017 and April 2018. Other than those websites pertaining to porn or privacy, Indian ISPs have been found blocking
access to websites and web pages belonging to domestic and foreign NGOs, United Nations organizations, human rights groups, health forums, feminist groups, and political activists at different points during the test period. Reddit India's twitter
handle (@redditindia) and Twitter handles of @anilkohli54, @tajinderbagga and @i_panchajanya, three accounts followed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi , were found blocked at some point or the other during the test period, and instructions to block these
Twitter handles are said to have been issued in August 2012. Indian ISPs also blocked access to web pages of several media companies including those belonging to ABC News, Telegraph (UK), Al Jazeera, Tribune (Pakistan) with some of them dating
back to 2012. The investigation also found ISPs blocking content related to the Rohingya refugee issue, and the deaths of Muslims in Burma and India more generally, and even snapshots of these content stored in Internet Archive's Wayback Machine have
been found to be blocked.
|
|
|