| |
Turkish parliament passes law allowing government to block any website without court oversight
|
|
|
 | 27th February 2014
|
|
| 8th February 2014. See article from
theguardian.com |
The Turkish government has pushed draconian internet censorship legislation through parliament. The new law was met with outrage in Turkey, with opposition parties accusing the government of wanting to introduce ever tighter control by bypassing the
courts. The regulations were adopted after a heated parliamentary debate during which one MP of the main opposition People's Republican party (CHP) compared the Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to Hitler. Hasan Oren said:
When you came into power you talked of increasing democracy in Turkey, but now you are trying to implement fascism. Remember that Adolf Hitler used the same methods when he rose to power. The law now needs to be
signed by the Turkish president, Abdullah Gul, to come into effect. The new measures will allow Turkey's telecommunications authority (TIB) to block any website within 24 hours without first seeking a court ruling. The law also obliges internet
providers to store all data on web users' activities for two years and make it available to the authorities upon request. Update: Signed into law 19th February 2013. From israelnationalnews.com
Turkey's president, Abdullah Gul has signed into force a repressive law voted in by the government that would introduce further censorship of web use. Gul said on his Twitter feed he promulgated the law - which the opposition and rights groups say
infringes on citizens' freedoms - after the government assured him it would soften parts of it through later amendments. He claimed: I am aware of the problems mainly on two points.... These concerns will be taken into
account in the new law
The government is now proposing that the internet censors of TIB will have to inform a judge about any decision to block a web page, according to the Hurriyet newspaper. The judge would then have to issue a
ruling within 48 hours or the TIB move would be deemed invalid. Update: Protests 23rd February 2013. From sacbee.com Police used water canon
and tear gas on Saturday against hundreds of people protesting against a new Internet law introducing even more censorship for Turkish surfers. Protesters threw glass bottles, stones and other objects in the direction of heavily armed police
officers, who made several arrests. Later Saturday evening the demonstrators erected barricades and lit fires in garbage cans. The protests are taking place in Istanbul's main shopping area in Istiklal street, near Taksim Square, the site of clashes
between protesters and police in August. Update: Amended 27th February 2013. From todayszaman.com The Turkish Parliament has amended the Internet censorship bill that has caused outrage in Turkey. The
bill was approved by President Abdullah Gul last week, but he asked lawmakers to revise several articles he considered to be anti-democratic. One of the points he highlighted was the need to seek a court order for blocking websites in the hope of
avoiding arbitrary decisions. Two articles of the controversial Internet censorship law which were considered problematic by the president have been changed three weeks after the bill was approved in Parliament. According to the changes,
the Telecommunications Directorate (TIB) will be able to obtain Internet traffic data only with a court order, except when there is the threat of cyber attack or viruses. The TIB will now need the decision to block content to be approved by a criminal
court of peace within 24 hours and the court will have 48 hours in which to reach a decision. |
| |
Turkish journalists protest against government censorship
|
|
|
 | 17th February 2014
|
|
| See article from
eurasiareview.com |
In Turkey , around 200 journalists protested against censorship and government pressure on the media . Many referred to the ruling party when they chanted AK Party get your hands off the media . Last week, recordings were leaked on the
Internet purportedly of Turkish TV executives manipulating an opinion poll and sacking reporters under government pressure. Journalist Hilmi Hacaloglu explained: The government is trying to control the media by using
the bosses or the journalists close to them. Journalists are saying they've had enough and we gathered here in the traditional press district.
The protests have reignited a debate about restrictions on press freedom , something the EU
candidate nation is very familiar with.
|
| |
Iraqi newspaper office bombed after publishing caricature of Iran's supreme leader
|
|
|
 | 15th February 2014
|
|
| See article from
indexoncensorship.org |
Independent Iraqi daily newspaper Al-Sabah Al-Jadeed has survived numerous attempts to destroy it over its 10 year existence. But on 10 February, the newspaper's Baghdad office was bombed and now its future is in doubt. The daily may need to find a new
office, employees are fleeing, and its website is facing one DoS attack after another. A few hours later the bombing a militia-like group entered the building. They came threatening us in broad daylight, so to speak, says Ismael Zayer, editor
in chief. The group escaped after employees managed to warn the police. The bomb attacks followed a social media campaign to demand the closure of the newspaper after it published its weekly supplement Zad on 6 February. The supplement was devoted
to the 35th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution in Iran and on the cover featured a caricature of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The cover caricature is a tradition for Zad, a supplement that came into existence in the first months of
the Arab Spring. These cartoons are never intended to be offensive or convey a negative message, they are just an alternative to uninteresting photos of VIPs. |
| |
Olympic skier caught topless in a behind the scenes video of a glamour photoshoot
|
|
|
 |
14th February 2014
|
|
| Thanks to Therumbler See article from
news.sky.com |
The miserable Lebanese sports minister has got all het up about topless pictures of a Lebanese skier, currently competing at the Sochi Winter Olympics. Jackie Chamoun was taking part in a photo shoot for one of those 'tasteful' sexy calendars where
the models are nominally topless but with props obscuring the breasts. However a behind the scenes video, shows her properly undressed and preparing for the photoshoot. This was published online and wound up the mean minded press and politicians
of Lebanon. The country's caretaker sports minister called for an investigation to take the required steps to avoid harming Lebanon's reputation and Lebanon's Olympic Committee condemned the skier's behaviour. In a statement on her
Facebook page , Jackie Chamoun apologised and said: The video and photos that you are now seeing are part of the making of, the preparation, it wasn't supposed to go public. Anyways, I want to
apologise to all of you, I know that Lebanon is a conservative country and this is not the image that reflects our culture.
But thousands of people have come out to support the skier, with many criticising journalists and politicians
for highlighting a seemingly insignificant issue in light of the crises facing the country. The I Am Not Naked campaign has more than 5,000 likes on Facebook with male and female models holding up #stripforjackie signs in solidarity. An Avaaz
petition calling for the investigation into Chamoun's photos to be dropped received over 1,500 signatures in just 24 hours. Middle East analyst and commentator, Patrick Galey, told Sky News: I can't think of a
clearer example of Lebanese political impotence than ordering an inquiry into a photoshoot while bombs go off throughout the country and sorely needed reform and infrastructure projects gather dust.
|
| |
Turkish police violently disperse crowds protesting at internet censorship
|
|
|
 | 10th February 2014
|
|
| See article from
aljazeera.com See Web conspiracies: A bill imposing restrictions on the internet presents Turkey’s president with a dilemma from economist.com |
Police in Turkey have fired water cannon and teargas to disperse hundreds of people protesting in Istanbul, against new repressive controls on the internet approved by parliament this week. Demonstrators hurled firecrackers and stones on Saturday at
police officers who cordoned off Taksim Square in the centre of the city. The new powers, once approved by the president, will let authorities block web pages within hours on their own authority. The Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan ludicrously claimed that censorship rules would not impose censorship: These regulations do not impose any censorship at all on the Internet ... On the contrary, they make it safer and freer.
|
| |
Israel parliament passes first reading of bill to ban the use of the word 'Nazi'
|
|
|
 | 21st January 2014
|
|
| See article from
dailymail.co.uk |
Israel has passed the first step on the road to more severe banning of the use of Nazi symbols. The ban would stop the use of all Nazi symbols and expressing remorse for the fall of the Nazi regime, and would make calling someone a Nazi illegal, with
a punishment of up to six months in prison and a fine of 100,000 shekels (around £20,000). In addition, the law would ban the use of the Jewish Star of David symbol when used in the context of the internment camps or in reference to the
holocaust. The bill has passed its first reading, but still has two more readings before it can become a law. The bill has been approved by the Ministerial Committee for Legislation, meaning that it stands a better chance of becoming a law because
it has the backing of the coalition government. The bill says the word Nazi would be banned for anything other than for the purpose of learning, documentation, scientific study or historical accounts. Also, using words that sound
like Nazi to indirectly refer to someone as an insult would also incur punishment. The bill received objections from Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein, saying that it might raise constitutional problems. He said:
Not all behavior that offends the public deserves to be made a crime. Is it proper in a democratic country to ban an entire world of images from the public discourse to protect people's feelings? Given the
centrality and importance of the constitutional right to freedom of expression, any restriction on it must be examined meticulously and with exceptional caution. |
| |
Turkish internet users protest against repressive censorship bill
|
|
|
 | 19th January 2014
|
|
| See article from rt.com See also
Where Is Controversial Internet Censorship Heading in Turkey? from
oryza.com
|
Turkish police used water cannon and fired teargas to disperse hundreds of protesters that gathered in Istanbul's central Taksim Square on Saturday for a rally calling against a bill that would extend government censorship of the Internet. Smaller
rallies have been held around Turkey including the capital Ankara and coastal city of Izmir. In Ankara about 300 protesters gathered chanting slogans opposing the government and the internet bill, calling the Turkish prime minister a dictator.
Activists have called for protests against the law further limiting the use of the Internet and social media. The campaign is circulating the internet with the hashtag #sansu redurde. The bill that includes the controversial law was
backed by a Turkish parliamentary committee on Thursday. It will be discussed by the National Assembly next week. The new legislation allows government ministers to block websites deemed to infringe privacy, as well as force internet providers to
retain information on their users, for up to two years. The bill also mandates ISPs to restrict access to proxy sites, making circumventing the censorship nearly impossible. The new legislation also raises fines for not removing the content
requested by the authorities. If the content is not removed within 24 hours after the request, it will be blocked by the Telecommunications Directorate (TI.B). In addition, web hosting services will be required to become part of a state-controlled
association. |
| |
UAE cinema goers walk out of The Wolf of Wall Street after 45 minutes of cuts render it incomprehensible
|
|
|
 | 15th January 2014
|
|
| See article from
gulfnews.com |
The Wolf of Wall Street is a 2013 USA crime comedy biography by Martin Scorsese. With Leonardo DiCaprio, Jonah Hill and Margot Robbie.
 The National Media Council (NMC), the UAE film censor, has weighed in on the uproar
caused by Hollywood film The Wolf of Wall Street in the UAE. Audiences of the Martin Scorsese film, which released on Thursday, have complained that scenes were haphazardly chopped and dialogues muted, making most of it incomprehensible. The film's runtime is 180 minutes on IMDb but cinemas in the UAE, however, list it at 135 minutes.
It seems that the film was massively pre-cut so that a single version could be distributed throughout the Gulf region. Juma Obaid Al Leem, director of the Media Content Tracking Department at the NMC said that the cuts were made even before it
came under their review: We didn't touch the film. The distributor already made the cut [when it came to us]. When we asked the distributors, they said they cut all those scenes and words, because they want to
distribute the film in GCC.
Al Leem added that, following complaints from moviegoers, the NMC has instructed distributors to leave the editing to them. [We have told them] next time, don't touch the
film. We will make the cuts. We will decide. Maybe some scenes will be accepted. Don't make any cut outside till they bring the full film and we will decide about the film, he said. We told them very clearly.
Reel Cinemas at The Dubai
Mall posted disclaimers outside its box office: The Wolf of Wall Street contains muted words, and some scenes have been removed as they were not considered suitable. Reel Cinemas has no control on the censorship and we
apologise for an inconveniences caused.
|
| |
Turkey steps up its internet censorship via increased surveillance, website licensing and quicker website blocking which is required to be more robust against circumvention techniques
|
|
|
 | 15th January
2014
|
|
| See
article from
bianet.org See
article from
hurriyetdailynews.com
|
Turkey's top business group has warned that a government-led bill to increase control over the Internet is worrying and the planned regulations might lead to wide censorship of the Internet. In a written statement, the Turkish Industry and Business
Association (TUSI.AD) noted the issues of freedom of speech, intellectual property and personal secrecy on the Internet should be delicately handled. The TUSI.AD noted access to thousands of websites has been blocked since Law No. 5651, widely
known as the Internet Law of Turkey, came into effect in July, 2007: The law, which results in limiting the individual's fundamental rights and freedoms, has also been subject to a 'rights violation' ruling of the
European Court of Human Rights, the statement read. In such a situation, the planned amendments to the law are concerning and will increase censorship on the Internet. The draft should be cleared of articles that could harm the fundamental rights and
freedoms and the Internet economy that is growing every day.
Some articles added to an omnibus bill submitted to Parliament last week will permit authorities to limit access to the Internet and monitor all actions by individuals
online and keep such records for two years. The draft law will permit officials to limit keywords searches more easily, meaning access to videos on video-sharing websites such as YouTube that include keywords deemed problematic by Turkish authorities
will be blocked. All individuals' Internet records, including details about what sites they have visited, which words they have searched for on the web and what activity they have engaged in on social networking websites, will be kept for one or
two years, according to the draft law. Websites will be forced to join some sort of registration body controlled by the government. In addition the government has specified that ISPs must censor nominated websites more quickly, and for the
implemented blocking to be more robust against simple circumvention techniques currently used by Turkish people to work around government censorship. |
|
|