South Australia's Attorney General has given the greenlight to both MA15+ and R18+ classifications for games.
As reported by Indaily, John Rau has made a U-turn on his previous decision to abolish the MA15+ classification in South Australia when
the new 18-rated game rating was brought in.
The Attorney General said that the recently released guidelines were stringent enough and different from the original report that he had no problem ratifying all game ratings:
The new MA15+ classification is now so different to the previous one that I no longer see an issue with it. I will, however, keep a watching brief on MA15+ games. The guidelines include much tighter requirements for every level of
classifications, in particular, what constitutes MA15+.
Offsite Comment: Australian Christian Lobby have a meaningless whinge
Australia's Classification Board has released censorship rules that will be applied to the new adult R18+ category for computer games.
As Kotaku points out, the document disappointingly makes reference to the interactive nature of computer games
necessitating tighter controls than other passive media formats, a notion that has been diluted by plenty of studies over the years, and never supported by any conclusive findings. The Censor Board document says:
Interactivity is an important consideration that the Board must take into account when classifying computer games. This is because there are differences in what some sections of the community condone in relation to passive viewing or the effects passive viewing may have on the viewer (as may occur in a film) compared to actively controlling outcomes by making choices to take or not take action.
Due to the interactive nature of computer games and the active repetitive involvement of the participant, as a general rule computer games may have a higher impact than similarly themed depictions of the classifiable
elements in film, and therefore greater potential for harm or detriment, particularly to minors.
Interactivity may increase the impact of some content: for example, impact may be higher where interactivity enables
action such as inflicting realistically depicted injuries or death or post-mortem damage, attacking civilians or engaging in sexual activity. Greater degrees of interactivity (such as first-person gameplay compared to third-person gameplay) may also
increase the impact of some content.
The word 'impact' seems to be a fudge factor that means that its up to them. 'Impact' is an arbitrary scale with an arbitrary value of 'high impact' that will get games banned. The censors
then justify the ban by a meaningless justification that the violence is 'high impact'. So Australian gamers will just have to wait and see how the censors arbitrarily interpret the arbitrary rules.
Australia's federal government has rejected recommendations from an outdoor advertising inquiry, turning down calls for greater regulation of supposedly racist or sexualised images in ads and for further restrictions on alcohol ads.
rejected the inquiry's recommendation that racist or sexualised images in outdoor advertising should come under new anti-discrimination legislation.
The government has also refused a recommendation that advertisers who do not follow industry codes
should be named and shamed in Parliament. It said this was primarily a matter for the advertising industry body.
During the inquiry's sometimes fiery public hearings last year, several nutter groups called for more censorship of outdoor
advertising. The Salvation Army said the present system of self-regulation had failed to protect the rights of children, particularly girls regarding sexualisation.
The inquiry also recommended that the Attorney-General's Department review how
well the industry acts on its recommendations and impose a co-regulatory system if there was not enough improvement. The government has agreed to give advertising industry bodies until December to respond to the report and show how they have acted on the
A while ago, the R18+ legislation for video games passed through Australia's Federal government successfully, and now it is time for each state to pass the law.
The ACT (Canberra) is the first territory to pass the R18+ law, which the ABC reports
was done so with tri-partisan support, though the Canberra Liberals failed in a bid to boost the penalty for inappropriate display or distribution of material rated R18+.
Attorney General Simon Corbell has said, this is about making sure that
adults are able to view and play and read what they wish as long as it does not do harm to others.
Two men from Australia's Victoria state have been given suspended jail sentences for supposed derogatory postings on Facebook.
They had created a Facebook page which allowed users to rate the sexual prowess of women. The page in question was
called Bendaz Root Rate . [ Bendaz is a name].
The two men lived in a town called Bendigo and created the page after seeing similar efforts for other towns. They ran afoul of authorities after the page was noticed and its contents
found to contain derogatory commentary that mentioned people well below the age of consent.
The Bendigo Magistrate's Court today deemed the content fell under the provisions of Australia's Criminal Code that prohibit using a carriage service to
offend, or publishing offensive material on an information network. The prosecutors claimed that the material could do lasting damage to those it mentioned, and was not merely embarrassing.
One the men was barred from using Facebook for two years.
The men were given suspended jail sentences of 6 and 4 months.
A generation of children were weaned on the wholesome teatime humour of The Goodies madcap antics. Now, 30 years on, the unseen clips that Australian censors discarded on the cutting room floor have
emerged for the first time.
Hanger is a 2009 Canada horror video by Ryan Nicholson With Debbie Rochon, Dan Ellis and Nathan Dashwood. See IMDb
The Australian Classification
Board has just banned Ryan Nicholson's Hanger. It was submitted by Bounty Films, who have previously battled censors worldwide with their release of Human Centipede II . But the Australian censor was unimpressed and banned the DVD with the
euphemistic 'Refused Classification' rating. Presumably the Australian censor will provide reasons for the decision at some point.
The film has never been sent to the BBFC but it would be sure to get a rough ride with scenes of sexual violence.
World Censorship Status
Australia: Banned by the Classification Board for:
Au 2012 Bounty DVD
UK: Never submitted for release
Germany: Hanger was released July 2009 in a severely cut and censored version for the German market. Unfortunately a torrent version of this was spread around the world and undermined the standing
of the film.
Hardcore gore from Ryan Nicholson who previously directed Gutterballs, another extreme gore video that hasn't made it to the UK.
director describes his film as:
A horrifying tale of revenge that begins with a back-alley abortion, and ends with a bloodbath so vicious that it brings a new meaning to an eye for eye. From pimps to
dealers and hookers to junkies, this film dives headfirst into the depths of human depravity.
The Australian Film Censor explained the ban as follows:
The film contains depictions of explicit sexual violence and sexualised violence that are very high in impact, as well as prolonged depictions of violence which are offensive and/or have a very high degree of impact. Depictions of violence include
detailed mutilation and disfigurement, viscera and shattered bone as well as blood gushes, splatter and spray.
A male character is tortured with a blow torch while two others are choked to death - one with excrement and the other
with a used tampon. Sexual themes underpin the depictions of violence with pornographic footage and still images featuring full frontal nudity with genital detail and explicit sexual intercourse frequently viewed in the background.
Other scenes of violence are cut with depictions of sexual activity and/or sexualised nudity. The sexual content and sexualised context both serve to heighten the overall impact of the violence viewed throughout the film.
This content exceeds what can be accommodated within the R18+ classification and, as such, is Refused Classification.
A Facebook page filled with racial jokes about aboriginal people has been taken down, after hundreds of people campaigned to have it removed.
SBS reported on the Facebook page, which allows posts with racial memes about Indigenous people.
The page was temporarily removed, before re-appearing on the site with a tag noting that the content contained controversial humour .
Communications Minister Stephen Conroy weighed into the debate, saying he thought it should be taken down.
We don't want to live by the same standards that Facebook does, Conroy said: I think it's an offence. It's been reclassified but I think it should be taken down.
Race Discrimination Commissioner Dr Helen Szoke warned the page
could be a breach of the Racial Discrimination Act: [The page] potentially does insult and offend, but it probably does more than that. I think the depiction of these images on Facebook actually moves more in to vilifying.
Jacinta O'Keefe started a change.org petition after a complaint to Facebook failed to result in the removal of the page: It is an openly racist page that is encouraging hate towards Aboriginal people. I find it incredible that Facebook would refuse to
remove this page .
The social media site has responded to complaints with the message: After reviewing your report, we were not able to confirm that the specific page you reported violates Facebook's Statement of Rights and
But the page ended up being removed anyway as of 6pm 8/8 2012.
New South Wales' top policeman has claimed that knife crime is soaring among youngsters supposedly because brutal video games that reward players for murder, rape and theft have made violence seem acceptable.
Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione
believes young people are being desensitised by spending hours acting out deadly scenarios on their computer screens:
The thing that's concerning me is the prevalence of people who are at this stage not just prepared
to carry a knife, but prepared to use it
That has increased significantly.
He said he had reached the conclusion that there was:
Nothing more potentially damaging than the
sort of violence they're being exposed to, be it in movies, be it in console games they're playing.
How can it not affect you if you're a young adolescent growing up in an era where to be violent is almost praiseworthy, where you
engage in virtual crime on a daily basis and many of these young people (do) for hours and hours on end.
You get rewarded for killing people, raping women, stealing money from prostitutes, driving cars crashing and killing people.
That's not going to affect the vast majority but it's only got to affect one or two and what have you got? You've got some potentially really disturbed young person out there who's got access to weapons like knives or is good with
the fist, can go out there and almost live that life now in the streets of modern Australia. That's concerning.
And not once did he mention any scientific or well reasons basis for his nutter rant.
Australia's Advertising Standards Board has issued a judgment in which it said comments made by fans of a vodka brand's Facebook page were ads and must therefore comply with industry self-regulatory codes and therefore consumer protection laws.
The ruling will force companies to vet comments posted by the public to ensure they are not sexist, racist or factually inaccurate.
Non compliant companies could be fined or publicly shamed for the comments that appear on
their Facebook brand pages.
A media lawyer is warning that the Advertising Standards Board's ruling on Smirnoff's Facebook page will put the onus back on companies to be more vigilant about the nature of the comments people are posting to
their company pages. John Swinson, a partner at law firm King & Wood Mallesons, said the board's ruling turned people's opinions into statements of facts .
Swinson said that if, for example, a member of the public posted a comment on
Smirnoff's site that claimed it was the purest Russian vodka and would lead to success with the opposite sex and Smirnoff failed to remove it, the company could be liable on a number of counts.
Although the Advertising Standards Board dismissed
the original complaint about Smirnoff, which centred on sexism, under-age drinking and obscene language, it ruled industry codes applied not only to what a company was posting on its Facebook page but to the user-generated comments that followed.
The board's determination also cited a recent case of a health company, Allergy Pathway, which was fined for allowing misleading and deceptive
testimonials to remain on its Facebook and Twitter pages.
Australia's advert censor has banned an ad for Unilever deodorant Lynx for demeaning older men, but it was cleared of degrading both sexes, racism and bad language.
The part of the ad deemed unacceptable came at end, when an old man produced
two deflated medicine balls and asks, Can you help me with these saggy old balls? Nobody's played with them for years.
The ad received around 150 complaints from the public. One of the complaints to the Adverstising Standards Bureau (ASB)
It is smutty and filled with crude innuendo of a sexual nature. It is not clever advertising but rather immature banter akin to schoolyard talk. It has nothing to do with the advertising of the product and is
totally unnecessary and demeaning to men. If the topic was woman's breasts there would be outrage. Not funny not clever just feral.
The ASB ruled that, with the exception of the depiction of the older man, the portrayals of the people
in the ad were not offensive.
Lynx responds to ad ban with fake press conference
boosting the double entendre Lynx responds to ad ban with fake press conference boosting the double entendre.
In a move suggesting that a ban on Unilever's Lynx Clean Your Balls ad was a part of the company's advertising strategy from the outset,
the brand has immediately launched a new video featuring an unapologetic mock press conference.
The Australian parliamentary Treaties Committee is recommending that ratification Of ACTA be deferred - partly because of its near-collapse in Europe.
The committee states that ACTA should not be ratified until a range of conditions, including a
cost-benefit analysis, are met.
Committee chair Kelvin Thomson says, in the committee's media statement outlines concerns including: a lack of clarity in the text; insufficient protection for individuals; and ACTA's potential to shift the
balance in the interpretation of copyright law, intellectual property law and patent law . He also notes the unfavourable reception that ACTA has received internationally.