FCC News

 2015



  Blurred thinking...

TV blurring of a nude painting reveals ludicrous US TV censorship rules


Link Here 14th November 2015
modigliani nudeStephen Colbert showed a penis on CBS's The Late Show . He showed it for only two seconds, the maximum length of time that the US network's censors would allow.

He also attempted to show numerous sets of female breasts and pubes, but they had to be blurred out for broadcasting at 11.30pm.

The explanation of the network's ridiculous censorship policy came about because Colbert noticed that some network news accounts of the record-breaking sale of Modigliani's Reclining Nude couldn't show the actual painting without blurring out her Hootie and the Blowfish , as he so delicately put it.

 

  Dishing out new fees...

The FCC changes the basis for censorship fees


Link Here 25th May 2015

fcc logo US TV censors at the FCC have announced that they will change the basis for determining censorship fees.

In particular, satellite TV providers like Dish Network and DirecTV a per-subscriber fee as it does cable and telephone TV providers. Currently the services pay a fixed fee for satellitle providers.

The FCC is considering lowering the fees for cable and IPTV now that satellite firms are paying more. However Dish and DirecTV argued that DBS generated nowhere near the regulatory costs of cable.

 

 Offsite Article: US TV censor attempts a land grab on the internet...


Link Here 7th April 2015
fcc logo FCC Proposes Treating Online TV Like Cable TV. Amazon Objects If It'll Stop You From Binge-Watching The Wire

See article from consumerist.com

 

 Update: Fleeting Fairness...

Disgraceful US TV censor lays into TV station that accidentally transmitted a tiny peripheral porn clip in a 6pm news item


Link Here 24th March 2015  full story: FCC TV Censors...FCC wound up by nudity and fleeting expletives

wdbj7 logoThe US TV censors of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have announced that they intends to fine a local TV station WDBJ7 $325,000 for airing sexually explicit material during a 6 o'clock newscast three years ago. The story aired about an adult film star who joined a local fire rescue squad.

The TV company obtained the troublesome video image online from the website of a distributor of the woman's adult films. The website, which was partially displayed along with the video image, is bordered on the right side by boxes showing video clips from other films that do not appear to show the woman who is the subject of the news report. One of these video clips, displayed in a box, contains the image of sexual activity involving manipulation of an erect penis. Although the box does not show the entire body or face of the apparently nude male depicted, the image shows a hand moving up and down the length of the shaft of the erect penis. WDBJ asserts that this image was displayed for less than three seconds.

The commission explained its arbitrary lynch mob justice:

Our action here sends a clear signal that there are severe consequences for TV stations that air sexually explicit images when children are likely to be watching.

WDBJ7's President and General Manager, Jeffrey Marks, issued a statement:

We are surprised and disappointed that the FCC has decided to propose to fine WDBJ7 for a fleeting image on the very edge of some television screens during a news broadcast. The story had gone through a review before it aired. Inclusion of the image was purely unintentional. The picture in question was small and outside the viewing area of the video editing screen. It was visible only on some televisions and for less than three seconds.

This year, WDBJ7 celebrates 60 years of broadcasting in the public interest, with news that is trusted and family friendly. We are sorry that this incident happened, of course, but we truly believe that the FCC failed to take into account the history of WDBJ7 and its six decades of outstanding broadcasting.

The enormous fine proposed by the FCC is also an extraordinary burden on protected speech. The FCC's largest base fine for other types of violations by broadcasters is $10,000. That is the fine for a misrepresentation to the FCC. A transfer of a license without authorization has a fine of only $8,000; use of a station to commit fraud results in a fine of $5,000; broadcast of an illegal lottery costs a station $4,000. As the FCC admits, its base forfeiture for a violation of the indecency rules is $7,000. This unprecedented proposed fine is more than 46 times higher than the FCC's own determination of the punishment for indecent speech.

As the FCC noted, Schurz Communications --- in its 60-plus year history of TV ownership -- has paid only one other FCC fine. That was for a minor and self-reported Children's Video issue.

WDBJ will oppose the FCC's proposed sanction.