Mission Impossible: Fallout is a 2018 USA action adventure thriller by Christopher McQuarrie. Starring Tom Cruise, Henry Cavill and Ving Rhames.
Ethan Hunt and his IMF team, along with some familiar allies, race against time after a mission gone wrong.
India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has cut out overt references to Kashmir in Mission:
Impossible - Fallout .
It was previously reported that director Christopher McQuarrie had set the film's final act in Kashmir because he wanted to make a more politically complex film.
However, the version of the film released in Indian
theatres has no mention of Kashmir - there are noticeable cuts in the final act of the film, and a section of the credits mentioning the banned location has been deleted.
The film still contains a few oblique references such as Ilsa Faust makes a
passing reference to the Nubra Valley and the Siachen glacier, but never is the word Kashmir mentioned.
The film makers tried to shoot the scenes in Kashmir but were refused permission. The scenes ended up being filmed in New Zealand. Ethan Hunt
and his crew arrive in Kashmir to stop a dastardly plan to unleash a nuclear attack on the region, which connects three of the most populous countries in the world, and therefore likely to claim the most casualties.
Blade Runner 2049 is a 2017 UK / USA / Canada Sci-Fi thriller by Denis Villeneuve. Starring Harrison Ford, Ryan Gosling and Ana de Armas.
Thirty years after the events of the first film, a new
blade runner, LAPD Officer K (Ryan Gosling), unearths a long-buried secret that has the potential to plunge what's left of society into chaos. K's discovery leads him on a quest to find Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), a former LAPD blade runner who has
been missing for 30 years.
India's film censors at the Central Board Of Film Certification (CBFC) have demanded cuts before granting an adults-only 'A' rating for Blade Runner 2049.
All the nude shots, frontal and back have
been deleted. It was pointed out to them that the nudity is computer generated rather than real, but this did not sway the censors.
There were also cuts to blur liquor bottles wherever they are shown.
American Assassin is a 2017 USA action thriller by Michael Cuesta. Starring Dylan O'Brien, Michael Keaton and Taylor Kitsch.
Twenty three-year-old Mitch lost his parents to a
tragic car accident at the age of fourteen, and his girlfriend to a terrorist attack just as they were engaged. Seeking revenge, he is enlisted by CIA Deputy Director Irene Kennedy as a black ops recruit. Kennedy then assigns Cold War veteran Stan Hurley
to train Mitch. Together they will later on investigate a wave of apparently random attacks on military and civilian targets. The discovery of a pattern in the violence leads them to a joint mission with a lethal Turkish agent to stop a mysterious
operative intent on starting a world war in the Middle East.
The Hollywood thriller American Assassin has been given an adults only 'A' certificate in India. and that only after cuts.
'Motherfucker' is still a taboo
term. It will always be the same, says a CBFC source referring to the word that was ordered out of IT and now American Assassin . The word 'bastard' has also been cut So has a shot of a woman's frontal nudity.
So another censorship example
that dashes any hopes that India's new film censor may be more willing to treat Indian adults as adults.
US MPAA: Rated R uncut for strong violence throughout, some torture, language and brief nudity.
UK BBFC: Rated 18 uncut for strong sadistic and bloody violence
It is a 2017 USA horror drama by Andrés Muschietti. Starring Bill Skarsgård, Jaeden Lieberher and Finn Wolfhard.
In the Town of Derry, the local kids are disappearing
one by one, leaving behind bloody remains. In a place known as 'The Barrens', a group of seven kids are united by their horrifying and strange encounters with an evil clown and their determination to kill It.
India's new film censor
has proven a breath of fresh air to the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). On Tuesday, the CBFC's new chairperson, Prasoon Joshi, shocked many and surprised some when he upturned the Examining Committee's (EC) decision to come down heavily on
Andres Muschietti's adaptation of Stephen King's IT .
In a historic decision, all the recommended 12 cuts -- including some profanities -- were restored, and IT has been given an all clear, with an uncut A certificate. A source said the
committee had cut out visuals of horror and many profanities, including words like 'fuck', 'pussy', 'cocks', and most shockingly, 'motherfucker, which was previously strictly forbidden. Apparently the latter has never been allowed in any Hollywood movie
The source says that the board now has clear instructions. If a film gets an adults only 'A' certificate, there will be no visual or verbal cuts.
In a series of rapid developments, over the last week, the CBFC had restored all the cuts ordered by the Examining Committee. Then they got cold feet and revised their decision within 24 hours, asking for
three muted words, 'pussy', 'motherfucker' and 'cunt'. But now the CBFC has revised its stance on the matter once again.
The film has been ordered to censor only one word 'motherfucker'. Says a source, The CBFC agreed to restore all the cuts,
except the profanity.
For comparison, in the the UK, the BBFC passed the film 15 uncut for strong horror, violence, language for:
Update: Film makers censored from airing cuts negotiations in public
In a series of rapid developments, over the last week, the CBFC had restored all the cuts ordered by the Examining Committee. Then they got cold feet and revised their decision within 24 hours, asking for three muted words, 'pussy', 'motherfucker'
and 'cunt'. But now the CBFC has revised its stance on the matter once again.
A DNA report claimed on Tuesday that Joshi has introduced new rules for the board, according to which, no information about suggested cuts will be shared with the
filmmakers and that the certificate will be the only communication with them.
Earlier, informal communication used to help filmmakers negotiate before they received the certificate, but the new censor was clearly not impressed by the public
negotiations about the censorship to Andrés Muschietti's IT so has moved to ban such discussions in the public sphere.
It seems tha the Indian film censors are
not being fully honest about there being just 1 cut to the film for strong language. The censors have also taken offence at the sight of a packet of tampons at a pharmacy. The packet was duly blurred lest it cause the downfall of civilised society in
India takes its time over changes to film censorship law and similar ideas have been discussed several times before.
Now it is reported that India's film censors of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has accepted the recommendations of a
government-appointed panel to introduce new movie categories.
The government appointed the panel led by filmmaker Shyam Benegal following allegations that the CBFC was stifling artistic freedom under the crazed CBFC chairman Pahlaj Nihalani .
The panel submitted its report to the Centre recently on restructuring the Cinematography Act and rules, under which films are categorised depending on the nature of its contents including adult themes. The panel has suggested adding more categories
for films with explicit sexual content instead of CBFC's use of the scissors, which often leads to conflict with filmmakers over allowing kissing scenes, sexual content and cuss words in films.
The CBFC board however questioned some of the
new categories and how they will be defined, such as adult with caution . At present, films with explicit adult content are given an A certificate, a U/A certificate which mandates parental accompaniment for children below 12 and the
U certificate for universal viewing.
The Benegal committee has recommended dividing the U and UA Categories to UA12+ and UA15+ and the A category to be sub-divided into A and AC (adult with caution) categories. The proposed A/C category
will not include pornography, but will be a certificate for films with explicit sexual content or nudity.
Pornographic films or those that supposedly hurt religious sentiments or harm national security will still be banned.
India's film classifications will require new legislation.
A draft Cinematographic Bill has bee posted on India's Information and Broadcasting (I & B) ministry's website. Comments from the public are now invited.
The drafting committee have included a clause such that if a film has been awarded a
certificate then this con then only be revoked by central government. Indian films have been targeted by by vested groups, religious campaigners and politicians all seeking localised bans on films, and the bill is seeking to end this rather chaotic
The Committee has also sought to bring the classification of films up to speed by suggesting a shift to the internationally prevalent practise of age-related classifications and certifications. As against the current practise of U
, U/A and A certification, the Committee has proposed to break-up U/A by age to 12+ and 15+ while retaining U and A . The bill also contains penalties of 1 to 3 years in jail, and/or large fines for
showing films to underage viewers.
The Committee has also reviewed certain definitions contained in the Cinematograph Act, 1952, to incorporate the sea of changes in film-making. The word film under the proposed law will not be confined to
the moving picture content of the film but will include songs and lyrics of the song. This has been done to give the film censors extended powers over songs that offend the easily offended.
The bill proposes that trailers, promotional
clips, posters and other material should be certified by the Board or through industry associations.
India's I&B Ministry responsible for the media had a meeting with film producers and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to consider amendments to the Cinematograph Act 1952.
If the Ministry has its way, films will no longer be
certified as U, U/A, A (adults only). Instead, they will fall under any one of the following categories:
Above 12 years of age (Under Parental Guidance)
Above 15 years of age (Under Parental Guidance)
Above 18 years of age
Filmmakers are not too happy with the proposal as they feel it will limit their audience. CEO of the Film & Television Producers Guild of India, Kulmeet Makkar, said:
Yes, there is a proposal by the I&B
Ministry but it would be very subjective in a country like ours, where children face different levels of exposure in different cities. One needs to understand India's diversity to understand the perspective of filmmakers. We hope the new certification is
The proposals will have to be formalised and passed into law by Parliament before changes can be made to the issuing of film certificates.
In the light of continuing tension between India and Pakistan, the Indian Censor Board has sought to distance itself from neighbour Pakistan's film board. It wants a new name, Indian Board for Film Certification .
Both Indian and Pakistani
film censor boards are currently known as the CBFC, Central Board of Film Certification in India and Central Board of Film Censors in Pakistan. This creates a lot of confusion on international platforms especially at film festivals, said Leela Samson, chairperson of the Indian film board.
The CBFC also wants to hide its work as a censor board by spinning the illusion that it is a classification board. Samson claimed:
In today's day and time, censoring films doesn't make sense ...UNLESS...
there are some gross violations such as a constitutional violation or something that hurts communal or religious sentiments [or nudity or sex or vulgarity or indecency or obscenity etc...], we will not recommend the use of scissors. Instead, we
will only certify the films as adult or ones that should be viewed with care.
Alongside this the board points out that using English language certificates is not a good idea. Samsom said:
It is a tragedy that... we continue to use English letters to denote whether a film is adult or fit for universal viewing... Most film goers don't even know what 'A' or 'U' stands for.
The CBFC wants certification
to be denoted in regional languages apart from using conspicuous pictorial signs or illustrations to inform a viewer if a film has scenes of extreme violence or sex and if it is suitable for children.
Besides the board has asked the government to
create more categories of certification. In particular a new category for children between the ages of 10 and 15 years is one such idea being considered.
India's information and broadcasting ministry and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) want to introduce two age categories, 12+ and 15+ instead of the current U/A category so that parents have some idea on whether a film should be watched by
their children or not. A censor board spokesman said:
U/A does not mean the film is okay for children to watch. It means that parents should use their discretion. A clear indication of which age is suitable for a film
is the best way to avoid any confusion.
For both 12-plus and 15-plus-certified films, children will have to be accompanied by adults to a theatre and may need to show age proof, if asked. Under current rules, a child of 12 years or
older can watch U/A films with adults in a theatre.
Sources in the I&B ministry said it had become imperative for the censor board to ensure clarity on which films could be allowed for unrestricted viewing by children. Officials said the step
to review the U/A certification became necessary after an uproar over a TV channel slotting The Dirty Picture in the afternoon, when children are likely to watch television.
The changes will be brought through an amendment to the
Cinematograph Act, likely to be tabled in the monsoon session of Parliament.
India's Information and Broadcasting Ministry is all geared up to expand film censorship classifications.
U [Universal] , A [Adult] and U/A [Children must be accompanied by an adult] will continue to exist. A+ [indicating excessive gore, violence
or sleaze], 12+ and 15+ are set to be introduced.
The proposed changes amending the Cinematograph Act will be implemented by October 2012.
Film censors of the CBFC said the need for devising new categories was felt as the film industry
pressed for classification along international lines.
Author Jaishree Misra, who has worked as a film classifier at the British Board of Film Classification in London, thinks it's an extremely positive step to have a more refined system than the
one India has had so far:
The pressure has been growing (both from filmmakers and society) to move from less censorship to more classification. Consequently, parents rely more and more on the system to guide them and
so the more 'signals' they get from the symbols, the better it is. The film industry can only benefit when audiences trust them not to have harmful content in their films and their regulatory system is the best way to achieve this.