New
Zealand has quietly been working on its internet filter, due for launch
by the end of next month.
The Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) began work on the filter
in response to community expectations that the government and the
internet service providers (ISPs) should do more to provide a safe
internet environment, New Zealand's DIA said in a statement.
Branded the Digital Child Exploitation Filtering System, the filter
uses White Box software from Netclean of Sweden. According to New
Zealand's National Business Review, it cost DIA NZ$150,000, which then
further customised it.
It has been trialled for two years and features a blacklist of more
than 7000 child pornography websites, which, like Australia's list, will
remain private, because the department believed displaying a list would
make a directory for offenders to use, the DIA said in its
statement.
The system operates by populating the routing tables of a
participating ISP so that a request for the [internet protocol] IP
address of a website containing child sexual abuse images results in a
first 'hop' to the Department's server, it said.
If there is a match to the particular web page that is being
blocked then the requester is presented with a blocking page
stating that access to the requested page is illegal. If there is no
match, then the requester is permitted through to the internet.
The Department's system preserves the anonymity of any person that is
blocked by not keeping a record of their IP address. Users who believe
they have been prevented from accessing legitimate content may fill in
an anonymous request that a site on the filtering list be checked.
Furthermore, the system will be overseen by an Independent Reference
Group, nominated by the DIA, made up of representatives from enforcement
agencies, the Office of Film and Literature Classification, child
welfare groups, ISPs and internet users.
The New Zealand system will be voluntary for ISPs and aims to be
milder than the Australian one, by just focussing on child porn instead
of refused classification sites which also include subjects such
as fetishes and terrorism.
This could be why the NZ filter has not been greeted with the same
level of outrage that Australia's has been, though opposition to it has
surfaced, from groups who fear it could extend to other objectionable
areas and become compulsory like Australia's planned filter. They also
have voiced concerns about the fact that unlike the Australian filter
plan, which has come under much public scrutiny, the New Zealand
equivalent has bypassed parliamentary procedures such as Bills, white
papers and select committee processes.