7th December 2007 |
|
|
| Suitable advertising on websites popular with children Permalink
|
By the National Consumer Council, children's charity
Childnet International and academic Agnes Nairn
From the
Guardian see
full article
|
A
report looking at 40 websites popular with children has found that users
were exposed to more than 200 ads, with many commercial messages
promoting products unsuitable for children, such as gambling and dating.
The study, called Fair Game?, assessed commercial activity on
children's favourite websites, including Cartoon Network, CBeebies,
Neopets, YouTube, Bebo, MySpace, eBay and Lime Wire.
Across 40 sites, the report found that when looking at just the homepage
and one additional web page a total of 211 online ads were displayed.
Because many of the websites popular with children are actually targeted
at older groups - including many social networking and gaming websites -
some of the ads were found to be unsuitable for young web surfers.
An examination of 70 of the ads found on children's websites found that
25% promoted products or services that are prohibited to children under
16 in the UK - including gambling and dating.
The report argued that some of the online marketing used hidden
persuasion techniques in the form of ads and commercial messages
that cannot be easily identified by children. Almost a quarter of ads
were integrated into the content pages, as opposed to being on a
separate part of a webpage that is clearly an advertising slot, such as
a banner, the study found.
However, the report also found that commercial content on websites is
not a top priority for parents, who focus on other areas of online
security, such as bullying, virus attacks and grooming by paedophiles.
The study urged the Advertising Standards Authority to be more
pro-active in making sure online users know they can make complaints to
the watchdog about internet ads.
The report also called for an education campaign, targeted at schools
and parents, to make them aware of the commercial nature of the online
environment.
Brands were urged to consider providing ad-free versions of their
websites in return for modest subscription fees.
However, the Advertising Standards Authority argued that the report is
flawed. The ASA regulates paid-for online ads but not websites created
by companies specifically to promote particular products and brand - a
"loophole" the report said should be closed.
|