The
advertising censor ASA has received more than 200 complaints that the
government's latest TV campaign on climate change is misleading.
The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) launched the
£6m campaign, in which the government throws its weight behind the
scientific evidence that climate change is man-made and will affect us
all.
DECC said it has taken the stronger approach because research has
shown that more than half of the UK public think climate change will
have no effect on them.
However, over the past week the Advertising Standards Authority has
received 202 complaints about the campaign.
Some have argued that there is no scientific evidence of climate
change; others claim there is a division of scientific opinion on this
issue and therefore the ad should not have attributed global warming to
human activity.
Another complaint was that the ad, which features a father telling
his daughter a scary bedtime story about climate change, is
inappropriate to be seen by children because it is upsetting and
scaremongering.
The ASA is assessing the complaints and will make a decision on
whether to launch an investigation in due course.
Update:
Drowning in a Sea of Complaints
22nd October 2009. Based on
article
from
dailymail.co.uk
The
ASA, the Advertising censor, is to consider the Government climate
change TV advert which featured a drowning puppy and rabbits dying of
thirst.
The ASA said the advert had prompted more than 350 complaints and
that it would now be launching an investigation.
It will now look into claims that the film should not have been shown
before the 9pm watershed because children would have been watching. The
censor will also examine whether the advert would have been
distressing for youngsters and whether it constituted
scaremongering.
Others have also complained that the advert which is part of a
£6million campaign had presented human caused climate change as fact and
challenged the statistics used. Critics also suggested that the content
was political and accused it of being propaganda.
The investigation is expected to last for two to three months before
a ruling is made.