According
to information provided to TorrentFreak and by BeingThreatened.com, a
consumer group set up to assist those wrongfully accused of infringement by
ACS:Law and other lawyers, a sex shop has become an unlikely victim in the
ongoing and hugely controversial anti-filesharing scheme.
Following a
request under the Freedom of Information Act, it has been revealed that
Darker Enterprises, the company behind the Private chain of sex shops,
applied earlier this year to have one of its sex shop licenses renewed.
But the application didn't go smoothly. An objection to the granting of
the license was received citing several potential grounds for refusal. The
first claim stated there had been an attempt to hide the real owners of the
applicants in order to obtain a license. The second was that the Private
Shops website previously supplied restricted videos via mail contrary to
law. Thirdly being a client of the ACS:Law scheme was cited in the
objection.
Following the receipt by one north-west council of one such objection
– which made direct reference to the scheme, describing it as one which
'…bullies innocent individuals in respect of alleged file sharing of
pornography…' – Darker Enterprises has withdrawn their renewal application,
closed the shop and left the town, explains James Bench of
BeingThreatened.com.
Sheptonhurst Ltd., which is a subsidiary of Darker Enterprises Ltd.,
was approached, along with a number of companies in the adult film industry,
by a firm of solicitors offering to assist in tackling the problem of
internet sharing of R18 [videos] on a no-win no-fee basis, said the
company on its connections with ACS:Law: There had been concerns for some
time not only because of copyright infringement but also because of the
likely detrimental effects of uncontrolled circulation of material that
should be subject to controls. The rights of enforcement were
assigned to the solicitors concerned by a number of distributors.
But it seems that although only a single shop has been affected at this
point, the situation has the potential to snowball.
The firm has to renew over a hundred licenses annually – a
considerable liability. While they may feel that they have already been
subject to a national campaign, the scope of their commercial vulnerability
may yet become apparent, explains BeingThreatened's James Bench: In
just the next two months license renewals are due in a further dozen towns
including Stoke, Newport, Halifax, Bedford, Brent, Stevenage, Woking,
Doncaster, Carlisle, Bolton, Brighton and Southampton, he concludes.